http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21003
Summary: wine32 wineboot is broken (using --with-wine64) Product: Wine Version: 1.1.34 Platform: PC-x86-64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: programs AssignedTo: wine-bugs@winehq.org ReportedBy: austinenglish@gmail.com
Compiled wine64, installed to ~/.winetest/install. Compiled wine32 --with-wine64, installed to same directory:
austin@midna:~$ rm -rf ~/.wine austin@midna:~$ ~/.winetest/install/bin/wine wineboot wine: created the configuration directory '/home/austin/.wine' Could not load wine-gecko. HTML rendering will be disabled. wine: configuration in '/home/austin/.wine' has been updated.
austin@midna:~$ rm -rf ~/.wine austin@midna:~$ ~/.winetest/install/bin/wine32 wineboot wine: created the configuration directory '/home/austin/.wine' wine: Module not found err:process:start_wineboot failed to start wineboot, err 126 wine: Module not found
Running 'wine32 notepad', etc. gives a similar error, but runs. But I'm trying to script this as an automated test, and using wineboot to create the prefix, but it depends on wineboot returning 0...
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21003
--- Comment #1 from Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org 2009-12-13 03:49:55 --- There's no 32-bit wineboot, we need the 64-bit one to create a valid prefix. But it's really too early to start running automated tests in a 32/64 setup, there are still many things that need to be implemented.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21003
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX
--- Comment #2 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com 2009-12-13 13:38:57 --- (In reply to comment #1)
There's no 32-bit wineboot, we need the 64-bit one to create a valid prefix. But it's really too early to start running automated tests in a 32/64 setup, there are still many things that need to be implemented.
Vincent was wanting to see if --with-64 broke anything (particularly shell32, which it seems to have)...but fair enough, I'll mark it a WONTFIX.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21003
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--- Comment #3 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com 2009-12-13 13:39:12 --- Closing.