http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23651
Summary: Spiceworks Crashes during Installation Product: Wine Version: 1.2-rc7 Platform: x86 URL: http://download.spiceworks.com/Spiceworks.exe OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs@winehq.org ReportedBy: hytek3000@yahoo.com
Created an attachment (id=29599) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=29599) Trace of the crash for spiceworks during installation
Wine Version: wine-1.2-rc7-10-g509e35d GCC Version: 4.2.4 Kernel: 2.6.31
I believe this to be another regression similar to what happened two months ago here with the same app: http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22694
Attached is the trace file.
Immediately after the files are unpacked, the installer crashes. I've never had the installer fail except for the regression in the bug linked above.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23651
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |download
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23651
--- Comment #1 from Vitaliy Margolen vitaliy@kievinfo.com 2010-07-14 08:52:58 --- If this is a regression please perform regression testing as described here: http://wiki.winehq.org/RegressionTesting
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23651
--- Comment #2 from Uriah hytek3000@yahoo.com 2010-07-14 13:01:25 --- Working Installation:
1.2-rc7 NO 1.2-rc6 NO 1.2-rc5 (still testing) 1.2-rc4 (still testing) 1.2-rc3 NO 1.2-rc2 YES 1.2-rc1 YES 1.1.44 NO 1.1.43 YES
So, from these test, something regressed between 1.2-rc2 and 1.2-rc3
Let me know if you want me to finish rc4 and rc5 regression testing. (takes awhile to get compiled......)
Thanks n Cheers.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23651
--- Comment #3 from Sven septim.dt@gmail.com 2010-07-14 13:05:48 --- You'd probably be better off doing a regression test between rc2 and rc3 to determine the actual commit that caused this (as described in http://wiki.winehq.org/RegressionTesting ).
Testing rc4 and rc5 is probably a waste of time, since you already know that the regression is between rc2 and rc3.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23651
--- Comment #4 from Uriah hytek3000@yahoo.com 2010-07-14 13:26:58 --- (In reply to comment #3)
You'd probably be better off doing a regression test between rc2 and rc3 to determine the actual commit that caused this (as described in http://wiki.winehq.org/RegressionTesting ).
Testing rc4 and rc5 is probably a waste of time, since you already know that the regression is between rc2 and rc3.
Im working on it now between rc2 and rc3. It is taking some time since the comiles are slow (even with disable-test)
I will post the bisect as soon as can :(
Cheers.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23651
Uriah hytek3000@yahoo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Installer, regression CC| |hytek3000@yahoo.com, | |wolfram@the-dreams.de
--- Comment #5 from Uriah hytek3000@yahoo.com 2010-07-14 14:09:48 --- If I did the bisect correctly (first time bisecting):
0dfedd50c38356c8049aef48e69b630204de0f79 is first bad commit commit 0dfedd50c38356c8049aef48e69b630204de0f79 Author: Wolfram Sang wolfram@the-dreams.de Date: Sat Jun 5 05:57:19 2010 +0200
user32: No sanity checks for BITMAPCOREINFO in BITMAP_Load.
:040000 040000 ea23acf6a4a549354f89d3194ceff81da628bb44 867f5a478c4a9e5a40239bd75a79c354eed4f008 M dlls
Seems related to the prior regression where it is dealing with bitmaps again.
Anyways, hope this helps.
Cheers.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23651
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|-unknown |user32
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23651
--- Comment #6 from Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@codeweavers.com 2010-07-15 00:55:59 --- Does reverting that patch help?
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23651
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #7 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com 2011-02-17 17:58:36 CST --- (In reply to comment #6)
Does reverting that patch help?
Yes. Fails for me in wine-1.3.13-315-gd9d4323. I built wine-1.2-rc2-183-g0dfedd5, which fails, but reverting 0dfedd5 on top of that works.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23651
--- Comment #8 from Wolfram Sang wolfram@the-dreams.de 2011-02-18 08:14:20 CST --- ? I will have a look.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23651
--- Comment #9 from Wolfram Sang wolfram@the-dreams.de 2011-02-22 01:40:40 CST --- First set of patches just sent to wine-patches.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23651
--- Comment #10 from Wolfram Sang wolfram@the-dreams.de 2011-02-28 12:45:06 CST --- Fixed here with commits 25923d2f16c56bb6840f92b2c4b0cc2b2ef927aa..c67f075d67a6d8de19dae570022265fc0f89ef52
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23651
--- Comment #11 from Wolfram Sang wolfram@the-dreams.de 2011-03-07 11:38:40 CST --- Ping. Can be marked fixed.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23651
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #12 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com 2011-03-07 12:26:30 CST --- (In reply to comment #11)
Ping. Can be marked fixed.
Yep, works here as well, thanks!
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23651
Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--- Comment #13 from Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org 2011-03-18 14:39:04 CDT --- Closing bugs fixed in 1.3.16.
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org