[Bug 11008] New: dll registration: Wine does not seem to regognize / silent as parameter

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11008

Summary: dll registration: Wine does not seem to regognize
                    /silent as parameter
           Product: Wine
           Version: CVS/GIT
          Platform: HP
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: wine-dotnet
        AssignedTo: [e-mail]
        ReportedBy: [e-mail]

Created an attachment (id=9989)
 --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=9989)
End of log, all registrations of dlls with /s proceed, failing with /silent

As you will be able to see in the attachment, Wine is registering all dlls for
which RegSvr32.exe had been launched the parameter is /s. However the .NET 2
seemed to ask the parameter /silent and the application (Trados) crashes.

[Bug 11008] dll registration: Wine does not seem to regognize / silent as parameter

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11008

Dan Kegel  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]

--- Comment #1 from Dan Kegel   2008-01-02 15:35:36 ---
Ah, but it's running a different program, regasm, not regsvr.

Launching: c:\windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\RegAsm.exe
Parameter:  /silent "c:\Programme\SDL
International\T2007\TT\Trados.Translation.Comments.dll

I think the thing to do is run that command by hand with logging, e.g.

WINEDEBUG=+relay,+seh wine
'c:\windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\RegAsm.exe' /silent
"c:\Programme\SDL International\T2007\TT\Trados.Translation.Comments.dll" > log
2>&1
and see what's in that log file.

[Bug 11008] dll registration: Wine does not seem to regognize / silent as parameter

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11008

--- Comment #2 from Yolande Haneder   2008-01-03 00:07:00 ---
Created an attachment (id=9997)
 --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=9997)
Log file of the error

Here you are with the details. I hope this can help you.

[Bug 11008] Problem through the registration of an assembly

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11008

Yolande Haneder  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Component|mscoree                     |kernel32
            Summary|dll registration: Wine does |Problem through the
                   |not seem to regognize       |registration of an assembly
                   |/silent as parameter        |

--- Comment #3 from Yolande Haneder   2008-01-08 03:17:06 ---
Changing title/component.
Faulty part seems to be VirtualProtect (kernel32), expected value seemed to be
79e74b61 and nothing is returned.

[Bug 11008] Problem through the registration of an assembly

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11008

Andrey Turkin  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]

--- Comment #4 from Andrey Turkin   2008-01-08 18:14:47 ---
This crash comes from wine deficiency (.NET runtime sets PAGE_GUARD on current
stack page, so page fault is thrown immediately and then fault handler tries to
write to the same stack page), but before there is thrown COM exception with
E_INVALIDARG status code. Maybe this is intended behavior but probably not.
Please try WINEDEBUG=+ole, maybe it'll give some clues on what's going on
there.

[Bug 11008] Problem through the registration of an assembly

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11008

--- Comment #5 from Yolande Haneder   2008-01-08 23:40:10 ---
Created an attachment (id=10131)
 --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=10131)
New log

The first comments about file protection are here on any log and don't
specifically have to do with this problem

[Bug 11008] Problem through the registration of an assembly

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11008

Jaime Rave  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]

[Bug 11008] Problem through the registration of an assembly

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11008

--- Comment #6 from Andrey Turkin   2008-01-09 04:06:24 ---
Strange enough - these means that source file cannot be read - so some files
wouldn't be installed; please try with WINEDEBUG=+file,+ver to determine why
does it fails.

[Bug 11008] Problem through the registration of an assembly

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11008

--- Comment #7 from Yolande Haneder   2008-01-09 04:24:15 ---
Created an attachment (id=10136)
 --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=10136)
3rd WINEDEBUG log as requested

Here the log

[Bug 11008] Problem through the registration of an assembly

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11008

--- Comment #8 from Andrey Turkin   2008-01-09 05:21:04 ---
Created an attachment (id=10137)
 --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=10137)
Fix for wineboot dllcache

Please try if this fix helps wrt these wineboot errors

[Bug 11008] Problem through the registration of an assembly

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11008

--- Comment #9 from Yolande Haneder   2008-01-09 06:51:08 ---
Created an attachment (id=10138)
 --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=10138)
Log with patch

I did apply the patch and recompiled however I have not installed everything
from scratch yet (same prefix as from before). Would it be necessary to
reinstall the dlls?

[Bug 11008] Problem through the registration of an assembly

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11008

--- Comment #10 from Andrey Turkin   2008-01-09 07:23:21 ---
Ok... so wineboot issue is solved, and now you back at regasm's double fault. I
believe you already seen http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10467#c8 about
how to work this around (I should have been search _before_ trying to debug
this myself).

[Bug 11008] Problem through the registration of an assembly

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11008

--- Comment #11 from Yolande Haneder   2008-01-09 07:52:21 ---
I am sorry but I don't have to add much to that other thread, my problem is
much different.

First it is not the same basis. It is based on Win2000 and I am using WinXp
which is much more based on assemblies. On the other hand, the fixes discussed
there are not helping me and copying the mentioned file from Windows is adding
me lines from shell32 with "can't parse URL..". Does not look good to me.

I have another approach to the NET and the NET is installing OK (past one
error) without this and a couple of dlls more.

This other bug is also a discussion from developers and showing my ignorance
there is not something I should do. I will do my best and probably nobody will
shout at me on a Trados bug.

My problem has rather something to do with ole because it's a problem that
didn't exist in 0.9.49, and a regression test is not helping me because there
was too much broken at the same time. Apart from a time with a memory leak, the
errors from the .NET on XP had not changed a bit since 0.9.49.

[Bug 11008] Problem through the registration of an assembly

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11008

--- Comment #12 from Yolande Haneder   2008-01-09 09:04:42 ---
Another thing worth mentioning about the .NET and tied to the fact that I am
not specifically trying to install the .NET (which is behind me at that stage)
is that Microsoft added one more difficulty for the .NET installation: It
requires the Windows Installer 3.0!! (first it is checking for 2.0 on XP and if
this is OK, it is checking for 3.0. I can only get past it because my
application is installing Windows installer 3.1, however not in the Wine prefix
(I can change the prefix, the installer is still installed)).

As a consequence one can play at will, my problem is not tied to the
installation of it but on the registration of Trados components (and maybe at
most with my bug that some parts for C++ are not registering too).

[Bug 11008] Problem through the registration of an assembly

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11008

--- Comment #13 from Yolande Haneder   2008-01-23 03:32:42 ---
Created an attachment (id=10420)
 --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=10420)
Details of the exception with +seh

Tested on the (now installing) Trados 2007 SP1 (build 826), which is crashing
at exactly the same place.

[Bug 11008] Problem through the registration of an assembly

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11008

Yolande Haneder  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #14 from Yolande Haneder   2008-02-20 08:55:20 ---
Assembly are registering, it's not blocking anymore, although one has to click
OK on dozen errors boxes because of failing import of dlls (module - dll not
found).

[Bug 11008] Problem through the registration of an assembly

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11008

Dan Kegel  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |CLOSED

--- Comment #15 from Dan Kegel   2008-02-22 11:39:55 ---
0.9.56 released, so closing all bugs marked as RESOLVED FIXED.

[Bug 11008] Problem through the registration of an assembly

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11008

Austin English  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Version|CVS/GIT                     |unspecified

[Bug 11008] Problem through the registration of an assembly

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11008

Dan Kegel  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Platform|HP                          |PC

--- Comment #16 from Dan Kegel   2009-05-29 19:00:50 ---
Bugs marked "HP, Linux" probably should have been marked "PC, Linux"
as HP really is for HP's HP-PA or Itanium systems, and very few people have
those.