[Bug 38320] New: HDM_SETORDERARRAY sent to ListView header doesn't affect column order in a list

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38320

Bug ID: 38320
           Summary: HDM_SETORDERARRAY sent to ListView header doesn't
                    affect column order in a list
           Product: Wine
           Version: 1.7.39
          Hardware: x86
                OS: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: minor
          Priority: P2
         Component: comctl32
          Assignee: [e-mail]
          Reporter: [e-mail]
      Distribution: ---

We currently only support LVM_SETCOLUMNORDERARRAY to do same thing. When header
items are reordered separately with HDM_SETORDERARRAY cached column data at
ListView side is not updated accordingly (there's no notification to do that).

[Bug 38320] HDM_SETORDERARRAY sent to ListViews's header doesn't affect column order in a list

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38320

Nikolay Sivov  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|HDM_SETORDERARRAY sent to   |HDM_SETORDERARRAY sent to
                   |ListView header doesn't     |ListViews's header doesn't
                   |affect column order in a    |affect column order in a
                   |list                        |list

[Bug 38320] HDM_SETORDERARRAY sent to ListViews's header doesn't affect column order in a list

[WineHQ Bugzilla]

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38320

--- Comment #1 from Gijs Vermeulen  ---
Nikolay, is this still present? If so, is there a way to test this in the
future?

[Bug 38320] HDM_SETORDERARRAY sent to ListViews's header doesn't affect column order in a list

[WineHQ Bugzilla]

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38320

--- Comment #2 from Nikolay Sivov  ---
It should still be present, yes. I don't think we have a test for it. I don't
recall if simply getting rid of separate column data is possible, so we don't
have to keep it at sync.