http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19462
Summary: d3d9: visual test crashes with glsl disabled with nvidia 190 drivers Product: Wine Version: 1.1.26 Platform: PC URL: http://test.winehq.org/data/fe9d36005fb7450177719f826e babb895c71a5f6/wine_ae-ub904-noglsl/d3d9:visual.html OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, testcase Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: directx-d3d AssignedTo: wine-bugs@winehq.org ReportedBy: austinenglish@gmail.com
=>0 0x00000000 (0x0065b758) 1 0x7e4e77fc ActivateContext+0x23c(This=0x138fe8, target=<register EDI not in topmost frame>, usage=CTXUSAGE_CLEAR) [/home/austin/wine-git/dlls/wined3d/context.c:1895] in wined3d (0x0065ba38) 2 0x7e4ffd44 IWineD3DDeviceImpl_ClearSurface+0x64(This=0x138fe8, target=0x14b388, Count=0, pRects=(nil), Flags=<register EDI not in topmost frame>, Color=4279304192, Z=0.000000, Stencil=0) [/home/austin/wine-git/dlls/wined3d/device.c:4929] in wined3d (0x0065bb58) 3 0x7e500e00 IWineD3DDeviceImpl_Clear+0x80(iface=<register EDI not in topmost frame>, Count=0, pRects=(nil), Flags=<register ESI not in topmost frame>, Color=4279304192, Z=0.000000, Stencil=0) [/home/austin/wine-git/dlls/wined3d/device.c:5083] in wined3d (0x0065bbb8) 4 0x7e5f6d0d IDirect3DDevice9Impl_Clear+0x9d(iface=<register ESI not in topmost frame>, Count=0, pRects=(nil), Flags=1, Color=4279304192, Z=0.000000, Stencil=0) [/home/austin/wine-git/dlls/d3d9/device.c:938] in d3d9 (0x0065bbe8)
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19462
--- Comment #1 from Henri Verbeet hverbeet@gmail.com 2009-07-25 13:21:51 --- Is that with FBOs disabled? I don't think that line should even be executed on a default setup.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19462
--- Comment #2 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com 2009-07-25 13:33:14 --- (In reply to comment #1)
Is that with FBOs disabled? I don't think that line should even be executed on a default setup.
No, FBOs enabled, just GLSL disabled.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19462
--- Comment #3 from Henri Verbeet hverbeet@gmail.com 2009-07-26 10:22:28 --- Created an attachment (id=22626) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=22626) patch
How does this work?
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19462
Andrew Nguyen arethusa26@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |arethusa26@gmail.com
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Nguyen arethusa26@gmail.com 2009-07-27 06:12:10 --- *** Bug 19474 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19462
--- Comment #5 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com 2009-07-28 16:49:27 --- (In reply to comment #3)
Created an attachment (id=22626)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=22626) [details]
patch
How does this work?
Doesn't seem to be failing any more, tried a few times...it's getting four failures though: visual.c:1575: Test failed: fog vs2 ps1 fvm0 ftm0 10: got color 0020df00, expected 0000ff00 +-5% visual.c:1575: Test failed: fog vs2 ps1 fvm1 ftm0 10: got color 0020df00, expected 0000ff00 +-5% visual.c:1575: Test failed: fog vs2 ps1 fvm2 ftm0 10: got color 0020df00, expected 0000ff00 +-5% visual.c:1575: Test failed: fog vs2 ps1 fvm3 ftm0 10: got color 0020df00, expected 0000ff00 +-5%
which the patch neither causes for fixes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19462
--- Comment #6 from Henri Verbeet hverbeet@gmail.com 2009-07-29 06:23:26 --- (In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment #3)
Created an attachment (id=22626)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=22626) [details] [details]
patch
How does this work?
Doesn't seem to be failing any more, tried a few times...it's getting four failures though: visual.c:1575: Test failed: fog vs2 ps1 fvm0 ftm0 10: got color 0020df00, expected 0000ff00 +-5% visual.c:1575: Test failed: fog vs2 ps1 fvm1 ftm0 10: got color 0020df00, expected 0000ff00 +-5% visual.c:1575: Test failed: fog vs2 ps1 fvm2 ftm0 10: got color 0020df00, expected 0000ff00 +-5% visual.c:1575: Test failed: fog vs2 ps1 fvm3 ftm0 10: got color 0020df00, expected 0000ff00 +-5%
which the patch neither causes for fixes.
I noticed those as well. You should probably ask Stefan about those, I mostly stopped caring about ARB shader correctness.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19462
JP St. Pierre jstpierre@mecheye.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jstpierre@mecheye.net
--- Comment #7 from JP St. Pierre jstpierre@mecheye.net 2009-07-30 09:35:38 --- *** Bug 19512 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19462
--- Comment #8 from knan-wine@anduin.net 2009-08-11 19:12:41 --- Patch is in 1.1.27.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19462
edward savage epssyis@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |epssyis@gmail.com
--- Comment #9 from edward savage epssyis@gmail.com 2010-05-03 04:32:22 --- Has this problem been fixed by the patch in 1.1.27?
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19462
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #10 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com 2010-05-03 13:06:21 --- In today's git, it's failing: http://test.winehq.org/data/89f3afb012c5296a096a45b6974e822183f7d880/wine_ae...
where the rest pass: http://test.winehq.org/data/89f3afb012c5296a096a45b6974e822183f7d880/wine_ae... http://test.winehq.org/data/89f3afb012c5296a096a45b6974e822183f7d880/wine_ae...
but no crash, so marking fixed.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19462
Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--- Comment #11 from Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org 2010-05-07 13:29:32 --- Closing bugs fixed in 1.1.44.
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org