http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36025
Bug ID: 36025 Summary: Please increase the attachment size to 1024 kB Product: WineHQ Bugzilla Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: bugzilla-unknown Assignee: wine-bugs@winehq.org Reporter: imwellcushtymelike@gmail.com
This is a minor nuisance really but certain compression tools don't know the difference between kB and kiB. When attaching large, compressed log files split into sets they can easily make the individual files too big by 24 k(i)B.
The minor adjustment would make life that little bit easier, and won't significantly affect file sizes or data transfer.
I'm assuming this can be easily changed by an admin.
Ubuntu's File Roller is an example.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36025
--- Comment #1 from Ken Thomases ken@codeweavers.com --- I'm not sure that working around the size limit is what we want folks to do. If we were willing to accept larger attachments when split into pieces, we'd just accept them as whole files.
Mind you, I don't know if the current limit was something that anybody associated with Wine picked or if it's just a Bugzilla default that we've not bothered to examine.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36025
--- Comment #2 from Ken Sharp imwellcushtymelike@gmail.com --- It's the default. :-D http://www.bugzilla.org/docs/2.22/html/configuration.html
The low limit is a good idea, but some logs can span two or three compressed volumes and with certain kinds of bugs you can't be certain that the first or last 100,000 lines (for example) are any use: the only thing to do is to check a full log.
If it hits four split volumes I usually give up anyway - the log is simply labelled "too big".
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36025
Anastasius Focht focht@gmx.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |focht@gmx.net Summary|Please increase the |Please increase |attachment size to 1024 kB |'maxattachmentsize' | |parameter in Bugzilla to | |1000-5000 for a limit of | |1-5MB
--- Comment #3 from Anastasius Focht focht@gmx.net --- Hello folks,
since this was just discussed in IRC #wine-staging I'd vote for 5 MB.
The reduce the amount of old garbage^Wattachments, a cleanup/purge procedure could be introduced for closed bugs (data retention period).
Regards
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36025
--- Comment #4 from Ken Sharp imwellcushtymelike@gmail.com --- Even better!
+1
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36025
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |austinenglish@gmail.com, | |jnewman@codeweavers.com
--- Comment #5 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com --- (In reply to Anastasius Focht from comment #3)
Hello folks,
since this was just discussed in IRC #wine-staging I'd vote for 5 MB.
The reduce the amount of old garbage^Wattachments, a cleanup/purge procedure could be introduced for closed bugs (data retention period).
Regards
Fine with me, but I'd like Newman's okay for it.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36025
--- Comment #6 from Jeremy Newman jnewman@codeweavers.com --- Fine by me. As it stands now WineHQ.org has more than 1.5TB of storage. So even at 5mb, it won't fill up any time soon.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36025
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #7 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com --- (In reply to Jeremy Newman from comment #6)
Fine by me. As it stands now WineHQ.org has more than 1.5TB of storage. So even at 5mb, it won't fill up any time soon.
Groovy, thanks Jeremy.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36025
André H. nerv@dawncrow.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED CC| |nerv@dawncrow.de
--- Comment #8 from André H. nerv@dawncrow.de --- closing, thanks Jeremy
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org