https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54520
Bug ID: 54520 Summary: Direct Parallel Port Access Removed Product: Wine Version: 8.2 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: dos Assignee: wine-bugs@winehq.org Reporter: medasaro@comcast.net Distribution: ---
Created attachment 74058 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=74058 The Willem EPROM Programmer Application
I rely on a Willem EPROM programmer for working with vintage hardware. This device requires direct parallel port access (not LPT, but direct raw access to the parallel port pins.) The application used to work in Wine (Wine 1.0) if I set the windows version to Windows 95 (or 98) and added the following registry keys:
'\HEX_CURRENT_USER\Software\Wine\VDM\ppdev\278' with value '/dev/parport1' '\HEX_CURRENT_USER\Software\Wine\VDM\ppdev\378' with value '/dev/parport0'
I had a hardware failure and upgraded to a new computer running a more modern version of Linux and the current version of Wine (8.2). Under this configuration, it no longer works. Looking at the source code, it appears that ppdev support has been removed entirely when winedos was merged into krnl386.exe16. I would very much like to see support for this added back into wine as I rely on it.
Thanks! Matthew D'Asaro
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54520
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |regression
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54520
Zeb Figura z.figura12@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Regression SHA1| |d637640f9af4ccfb6639361fc54 | |8d4bbeaafeb6f CC| |z.figura12@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Zeb Figura z.figura12@gmail.com --- Not sure if it makes sense to merge this with bug 54314.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54520
Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #2 from Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org --- (In reply to Zeb Figura from comment #1)
Not sure if it makes sense to merge this with bug 54314.
Yes, it's the same thing.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 54314 ***
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54520
--- Comment #3 from Zeb Figura z.figura12@gmail.com --- (In reply to Alexandre Julliard from comment #2)
(In reply to Zeb Figura from comment #1)
Not sure if it makes sense to merge this with bug 54314.
Yes, it's the same thing.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 54314 ***
It's the same thing, yes, I just was afraid that'd end up making 54314 a metabug that would be hard to close.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54520
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--- Comment #4 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com --- Closing.