http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2498
------- Additional Comments From saulius.krasuckas@elst.vtu.lt 2005-25-01 07:04 ------- during regression-test I use CDT timezone, so the date formatted in such way:
"Mon Sep 06 15:23:27 2004 CDT"
to format it I:
1, go to the wine-cvs mailing list. 2, select the patch of interest (I would prefer the earliest patch of "Sep 06 2004" as there may arise time differences because of difference of the timezones used by Alexandre's submission tool and your cvs-client). 3, copy down the date of the patch ("Mon Sep 06 2004 - 15:23:26 CDT"). 4, rearrange it by moving "2004 " just before the "CDT " begins. 5, eliminate "- " junk. 6, change time-part by 1 second. to make sure the patch will get into your CVS tree I increase the time. for the patch to not get into the tree I decrease the time. in my example I have increased it.
to see the differences in non-abstract way:
"Mon Sep 06 2004 - 15:23:26 CDT" (from the web-page) "Mon Sep 06 15:23:27 2004 CDT" (to the cvs-client)
not really so hard, huh? sorry, if this is redundant. I have learned no other way around for a while.
and I would suggest the ending patch to be of "Wed Sep 08 2004 - 19:30:30 CDT", as it is the last patch this day commited on "Sept 8, 2004". Hence:
"Wed Sep 08 2004 - 19:30:30 CDT" (from the web-page) "Wed Sep 08 19:30:31 2004 CDT" (to the cvs-client)
and it seems you are stuck with two different regressing patches, living each near other. when the first offending patch is found, I suggest to test the Wine by traveling from the found patch to the one of "Fri Sep 10 2004 - 17:30:06 CDT", lets say.
HTH, corrections are welcome.
[1] http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-cvs/2004/09/index.html
-
Wine Bugs