[Bug 49840] New: chromium fails to load (--no-sandbox is a workaround)

List overview All Threads

newer

older

[Bug 43498] New: Built-in comctl32...

[Bug 50838] New: That you can...

WineHQ Bugzilla

14 Sep 2020 14 Sep '20

5:15 p.m.

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49840

Bug ID: 49840 Summary: chromium fails to load (--no-sandbox is a workaround) Product: Wine Version: 5.16 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs@winehq.org Reporter: dark.shadow4@web.de Distribution: ---

Linking old version of chromium, since the newer versions have issues with d3d as well. Download: https://commondatastorage.googleapis.com/chromium-browser-snapshots/index.ht...

As noted, the sandbox errors and no page loads.

The latest working wine version is wine-staging-5.4. This could either be a syscall issue again, since the patchset was changed a lot during integration into Wine - or maybe it's an unrelated regression.

-- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

Show replies by date

WineHQ Bugzilla

14 Sep 14 Sep

5:16 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 49840] chromium 32bit fails to load (--no-sandbox is a workaround)

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49840

Fabian Maurer dark.shadow4@web.de changed:

--- Comment #1 from Fabian Maurer dark.shadow4@web.de --- Note: This bugreport is only about chromium 32bit, not (google) chrome nor CEF.

-- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

WineHQ Bugzilla

7:13 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 49840] chromium 32bit fails to load (--no-sandbox is a workaround)

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49840

Fabian Maurer dark.shadow4@web.de changed:

--- Comment #2 from Fabian Maurer dark.shadow4@web.de --- I did a bisect between wine-staging-5.4 and wine-staging-5.5:

commit 6b498d98a86b5179a025afbaaeaa3d60a8bd74ec Author: Zebediah Figura z.figura12@gmail.com Date: Fri Mar 20 12:15:25 2020 -0500

ntdll: Consider mount points to be reparse points in get_file_info().

Signed-off-by: Zebediah Figura zfigura@codeweavers.com Signed-off-by: Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org

@Zebediah Figura Would you mind taking a look at that?

-- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

WineHQ Bugzilla

7:15 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 49840] chromium 32bit fails to load (--no-sandbox is a workaround)

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49840

--- Comment #3 from Fabian Maurer dark.shadow4@web.de --- Created attachment 68180 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=68180 Patch to revert the commit and fix the issue

The commit in question does not revert cleanly, attaching an edited revert-version.

Reverting the commit that way makes chromium work fine again. This issue has nothing to do with syscall.

-- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

WineHQ Bugzilla

7:16 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 49840] chromium 32bit fails to load (--no-sandbox is a workaround)

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49840

Fabian Maurer dark.shadow4@web.de changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |regression

-- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

WineHQ Bugzilla

15 Sep 15 Sep

8:20 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 49840] chromium 32bit fails to load (--no-sandbox is a workaround)

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49840

Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |austinenglish@gmail.com

-- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

WineHQ Bugzilla

8:20 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 49840] chromium 32bit fails to load (--no-sandbox is a workaround)

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49840

Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|-unknown |ntdll

-- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

WineHQ Bugzilla

6 Dec 6 Dec

5:54 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 49840] chromium 32bit fails to load (--no-sandbox is a workaround)

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49840

--- Comment #4 from Zebediah Figura z.figura12@gmail.com --- 32-bit chromium seems to work fine for me with upstream Wine, after working around bug 44985 and bug 32342. That's after downloading "chrome-win32.zip", running "chrome.exe", and visiting winehq.org.

Can you confirm whether this is fixed, or perhaps there's a difference in setup? In particular, given the regression hash, it might make a difference if you're running from a separate file system.

hazel@watership:~/Downloads$ sha1sum Win_580746_chrome-win32.zip 5d7f28aaa294b1a439fdb8fea414dad5f61116a1 Win_580746_chrome-win32.zip

-- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

WineHQ Bugzilla

6:04 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 49840] chromium 32bit fails to load (--no-sandbox is a workaround)

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49840

--- Comment #5 from Fabian Maurer dark.shadow4@web.de --- Good point. It works for me as well when run from .wine. But usually I run wine programs from my Ramdisk (/tmp/ramdisk/) which is a tmpfs, and that's where the issue appears again.

-- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

WineHQ Bugzilla

7 Dec 7 Dec

8:58 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 49840] chromium 32bit fails to load (--no-sandbox is a workaround)

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49840

--- Comment #6 from Zebediah Figura z.figura12@gmail.com --- I checked Windows, and it fails in a similar manner there when run from a mounted folder. I think this is a WONTFIX.

-- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

WineHQ Bugzilla

8 Dec 8 Dec

12:08 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 49840] chromium 32bit fails to load (--no-sandbox is a workaround)

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49840

--- Comment #7 from Fabian Maurer dark.shadow4@web.de --- (In reply to Zebediah Figura from comment #6)

...

I checked Windows, and it fails in a similar manner there when run from a mounted folder.

What exactly do you mean by "mounted folder"? I tried running chromium from "E:" on my windows install, and it works fine. But that won't work on wine, because of that regression. Linux does not have the concept of drive letter, still I'd expect the "Z:" drive in Wine to work properly.

-- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

WineHQ Bugzilla

12:12 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 49840] chromium 32bit fails to load (--no-sandbox is a workaround)

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49840

--- Comment #8 from Zebediah Figura z.figura12@gmail.com --- Win32 volumes can be mounted to folders other than drive letters; this can be done from diskmgmt.msc. The attached patch, in a manner of speaking, maps Unix mount points to Win32 mounted folders, because the concepts match up quite nicely.

It is not particularly surprising that Windows programs don't account for mounted folders; it seems they are quite a little-known feature. On the other hand, simply ignoring filesystem boundaries doesn't particularly help us; one example of this is bug 38114.

-- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

WineHQ Bugzilla

12:39 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 49840] chromium 32bit fails to load (--no-sandbox is a workaround)

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49840

--- Comment #9 from Fabian Maurer dark.shadow4@web.de --- And aren't files under dosdevices/z:/ not mapped to Z:\ inside Wine? Because that should work, no?

-- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

WineHQ Bugzilla

1:06 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 49840] chromium 32bit fails to load (--no-sandbox is a workaround)

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49840

--- Comment #10 from Zebediah Figura z.figura12@gmail.com --- In general, yes, and the general case works for me. /tmp/, however, is a separate file system (generally of type tmpfs).

-- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

WineHQ Bugzilla

7:48 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 49840] chromium 32bit fails to load (--no-sandbox is a workaround)

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49840

--- Comment #11 from Fabian Maurer dark.shadow4@web.de --- Ah, that's what you mean. I can confirm it works in /var/cache/ (directly on root) but not on /home/fabian/. Presumably because that is mounted into / as well. Is that how things should be? I'd hope it atleast works for my home folder...

-- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

WineHQ Bugzilla

7:59 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 49840] chromium 32bit fails to load (--no-sandbox is a workaround)

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49840

--- Comment #12 from Zebediah Figura z.figura12@gmail.com --- I'm not entirely sure what you mean; but I'd guess it fails because /home is a separate file system?

-- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

WineHQ Bugzilla

8:49 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 49840] chromium 32bit fails to load (--no-sandbox is a workaround)

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49840

--- Comment #13 from Fabian Maurer dark.shadow4@web.de --- Yes, my /home is a different filesystem from / So this is a works-as-intended?

-- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

WineHQ Bugzilla

9:16 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 49840] chromium 32bit fails to load (--no-sandbox is a workaround)

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49840

--- Comment #14 from Zebediah Figura z.figura12@gmail.com --- As far as I can tell, yes. It's a bit unfortunate, but I don't see any good way to work around it in Wine.

-- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

WineHQ Bugzilla

10:05 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 49840] chromium 32bit fails to load (--no-sandbox is a workaround)

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49840

--- Comment #15 from Fabian Maurer dark.shadow4@web.de --- Alrighty then, feel free to close.

-- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

WineHQ Bugzilla

10:32 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 49840] chromium 32bit fails to load (--no-sandbox is a workaround)

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49840

Zebediah Figura z.figura12@gmail.com changed:

--- Comment #16 from Zebediah Figura z.figura12@gmail.com --- Resolving WONTFIX.

-- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

WineHQ Bugzilla

9 Dec 9 Dec

11:38 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 49840] chromium 32bit fails to load (--no-sandbox is a workaround)

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49840

Olivier F. R. Dierick o.dierick@piezo-forte.be changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |o.dierick@piezo-forte.be

--- Comment #17 from Olivier F. R. Dierick o.dierick@piezo-forte.be --- Hello,

What are the files that need not be on a mount point for chromium to work? The whole wineprefix, only chromium itself, or other?

Regards.

-- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

WineHQ Bugzilla

11:42 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 49840] chromium 32bit fails to load (--no-sandbox is a workaround)

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49840

--- Comment #18 from Zebediah Figura z.figura12@gmail.com --- At least the executable itself apparently can't be inside a separate mount point. That said, I suspect (though haven't tested) that things *will* just work if you manually assign a drive letter to the root of the mounted drive, or to any subdirectory thereof; for example, putting Chromium anywhere inside drive_c will work even if drive_c resides on a different file system than the root.

-- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

WineHQ Bugzilla

12 Feb 12 Feb

10:14 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 49840] chromium 32bit fails to load (--no-sandbox is a workaround)

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49840

Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED

--- Comment #19 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com --- Closing.

-- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

WineHQ Bugzilla

10:14 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 49840] chromium 32bit fails to load (--no-sandbox is a workaround)

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49840

Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |RESOLVED

--- Comment #20 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com --- Closing.

-- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

WineHQ Bugzilla

23 Apr 23 Apr

3:18 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 49840] chromium 32bit fails to load (--no-sandbox is a workaround)

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49840

Gijs Vermeulen gijsvrm@gmail.com changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED

--- Comment #21 from Gijs Vermeulen gijsvrm@gmail.com --- Closing WONTFIX.

-- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1367

Age (days ago)

1588

Last active (days ago)

wine-bugs@winehq.org

24 comments

1 participants

tags (0)

participants (1)

WineHQ Bugzilla