http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12486
Summary: Microsoft Office Standard 2007 installation failure Product: Wine Version: 0.9.58. Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs@winehq.org ReportedBy: tiago.freire@gmail.com
Created an attachment (id=12047) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=12047) console error messages
The installation does not crash, but does not continue with an error message about missing or corrupted files. The message is in (Brazilian) Portuguese, bt says something like: ----- Installation Error(Window Title)
Installation cannot continue because a required file is corrupted or unavailable. Execute the installation again from the source disk or download place(?or site?). ----- Tested on Ubuntu Hardy Heron Beta with wine 0.9.59. strangely, bugzilla only lists up to 0.9.58.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12486
Tiago Freire tiago.freire@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|enhancement |normal Version|0.9.58. |unspecified
--- Comment #1 from Tiago Freire tiago.freire@gmail.com 2008-04-10 13:45:03 --- Additionally: the splash window show up briefly before the dialog with the error message shows up.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12486
Andras Kovacs andras@csevego.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andras@csevego.net
--- Comment #2 from Andras Kovacs andras@csevego.net 2008-04-11 18:43:46 --- this is a builtin msxml3 bug (unimplemented interface), with native it goes further, then crashes in builtin rpcrt4.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12486
Lei Zhang thestig@google.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|-unknown |msxml3
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12486
--- Comment #3 from Alistair Leslie-Hughes leslie_alistair@hotmail.com 2008-04-25 09:01:55 --- What interfaces are not implemented?
The only ones I see are {6d5140c1-7436-11ce-8034-00aa006009fa} = IServiceProvider {79eac9e4-baf9-11ce-8c82-00aa004ba90b} = IInternetProtocol
Can you provide a +msxml log please?
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12486
--- Comment #4 from Jaime Rave jaimerave@gmail.com 2008-04-25 13:38:03 --- Created an attachment (id=12471) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=12471) +msxml Console Output
+msxml Log
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12486
Rob Shearman rob@codeweavers.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rob@codeweavers.com Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #5 from Rob Shearman rob@codeweavers.com 2008-04-26 03:36:15 --- Huw looked into this bug briefly and thought that it could be due to the xmlnode_get_xml call not returning exactly the same text as with native. It could be that Office 2007's setup depends on the whitespace being a certain way in the returned string.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12486
--- Comment #6 from James Hawkins truiken@gmail.com 2008-04-26 03:40:13 --- The problem is that libxml2 strips \r\l from the original file, while msxml keeps them.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12486
--- Comment #7 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com 2008-06-12 17:05:47 --- Still present in 1.0-rc4.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12486
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |austinenglish@gmail.com
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12486
joao.eiras joao.eiras@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |joao.eiras@gmail.com
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12486
joao.eiras joao.eiras@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |joao.eiras@gmail.com
--- Comment #8 from Alistair Leslie-Hughes leslie_alistair@hotmail.com 2008-06-25 00:59:46 --- Created an attachment (id=14338) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=14338) Attempt to keep formating when dumping xml
Can someone try this patch to see if it helps, I don't have access to office 2007.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12486
--- Comment #9 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com 2008-06-27 01:06:43 --- (In reply to comment #8)
Created an attachment (id=14338)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=14338) [details]
Attempt to keep formating when dumping xml
Can someone try this patch to see if it helps, I don't have access to office 2007.
Doesn't work for me. I'll attach a new +msxml log for you.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12486
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |patch
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12486
--- Comment #10 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com 2008-06-27 01:08:31 --- Created an attachment (id=14385) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=14385) +msxml log (with patch) in git
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12486
--- Comment #11 from joao.eiras joao.eiras@gmail.com 2008-06-27 02:55:04 --- I recall the msxml log telling me that it did not support nodes with node type 8 (comments node), and the installation failed thereafter, but that was some time ago. I don't know if our msxml was updated since then. The Office installer stores a digital signature in a xml file inside a comment. I think that the installer then reads the sig and validates something.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12486
--- Comment #12 from James Hawkins truiken@gmail.com 2008-06-27 10:33:31 --- (In reply to comment #11)
I recall the msxml log telling me that it did not support nodes with node type 8 (comments node), and the installation failed thereafter, but that was some time ago. I don't know if our msxml was updated since then. The Office installer stores a digital signature in a xml file inside a comment. I think that the installer then reads the sig and validates something.
No, the exact problem is stated in comment #6.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12486
Anastasius Focht focht@gmx.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |focht@gmx.net
--- Comment #12 from James Hawkins truiken@gmail.com 2008-06-27 10:33:31 --- (In reply to comment #11)
I recall the msxml log telling me that it did not support nodes with node type 8 (comments node), and the installation failed thereafter, but that was some time ago. I don't know if our msxml was updated since then. The Office installer stores a digital signature in a xml file inside a comment. I think that the installer then reads the sig and validates something.
No, the exact problem is stated in comment #6.
--- Comment #13 from Anastasius Focht focht@gmx.net 2008-07-02 05:10:02 --- Hello,
is there any decision made yet to fork/replace/bugger libxml? I don't see any argument to convince the libxml guys for incorporating such breaking "feature".
The stripping of \r in \r\n sequences and handling of other format characters when parsing is mandated by the XML specification - that's how they implemented it.
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-20060816/#sec-line-ends http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-20060816/#sec-white-space
The office installer uses a custom variant of signed XML, calculating a hash of document element and all child data (usually all stuff between <Setup></Setup>). As already pointed out, all the line ends and formatting have to be *kept* to let the installer's XML verification succeed.
Just for illustration, the XML buffer dumps before being given to hash calculation:
--- snip windows xml dump --- +00 3C 00 53 00|65 00 74 00|75 00 70 00|20 00 49 00| <.S.e.t.u.p. .I. +10 64 00 3D 00|22 00 45 00|78 00 63 00|65 00 6C 00| d.=.".E.x.c.e.l. +20 2E 00 64 00|65 00 2D 00|64 00 65 00|22 00 20 00| ..d.e.-.d.e.". . +30 54 00 79 00|70 00 65 00|3D 00 22 00|41 00 64 00| T.y.p.e.=.".A.d. +40 64 00 4F 00|6E 00 22 00|20 00 4B 00|65 00 79 00| d.O.n.". .K.e.y. +50 77 00 6F 00|72 00 64 00|3D 00 22 00|45 00 78 00| w.o.r.d.=.".E.x. +60 63 00 65 00|6C 00 4D 00|55 00 49 00|22 00 20 00| c.e.l.M.U.I.". . +70 43 00 75 00|6C 00 74 00|75 00 72 00|65 00 3D 00| C.u.l.t.u.r.e.=. +80 22 00 64 00|65 00 2D 00|64 00 65 00|22 00 3E 00| ".d.e.-.d.e.".>. +90 0D 00 0A 00|09 00 3C 00|4F 00 70 00|74 00 69 00| ......<.O.p.t.i. .. --- snip windows xml dump ---
0x0D, 0x0A, 0x09, 0x20
This is what it looks like in libxml (keep format): NOTE: the memory dump is from another XML file but it should give the idea:
--- snip wine xml dump --- +00 3C 00 53 00|65 00 74 00|75 00 70 00|20 00 49 00| <.S.e.t.u.p. .I. +10 64 00 3D 00|22 00 50 00|6F 00 77 00|65 00 72 00| d.=.".P.o.w.e.r. +20 50 00 6F 00|69 00 6E 00|74 00 2E 00|64 00 65 00| P.o.i.n.t...d.e. +30 2D 00 64 00|65 00 22 00|20 00 54 00|79 00 70 00| -.d.e.". .T.y.p. +40 65 00 3D 00|22 00 41 00|64 00 64 00|4F 00 6E 00| e.=.".A.d.d.O.n. +50 22 00 20 00|4B 00 65 00|79 00 77 00|6F 00 72 00| ". .K.e.y.w.o.r. +60 64 00 3D 00|22 00 50 00|6F 00 77 00|65 00 72 00| d.=.".P.o.w.e.r. +70 50 00 6F 00|69 00 6E 00|74 00 4D 00|55 00 49 00| P.o.i.n.t.M.U.I. +80 22 00 20 00|43 00 75 00|6C 00 74 00|75 00 72 00| ". .C.u.l.t.u.r. +90 65 00 3D 00|22 00 64 00|65 00 2D 00|64 00 65 00| e.=.".d.e.-.d.e. +A0 22 00 3E 00|0A 00 20 00|20 00 3C 00|4F 00 70 00| ".>... . .<.O.p. .. --- snip wine xml dump ---
0x0A, 0x20
Regards
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12486
--- Comment #14 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com 2008-07-02 08:21:26 --- Thanks, as always, for the analysis Anastastius. Alistair is working on a fix, but apparently it's a doozie. I offered him my copy of office to borrow before I go on vacation, but apparently he now has access to one. Hopefully we'll have a fix soon, so I can file more Office 2007 bugs ;-).
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12486
Alistair Leslie-Hughes leslie_alistair@hotmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #14338|0 |1 is obsolete| |
--- Comment #15 from Alistair Leslie-Hughes leslie_alistair@hotmail.com 2008-07-09 01:29:15 --- Created an attachment (id=14686) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=14686) Correctly format the xml for office 2007
This patch will allow the Installer to validated each of the XML documents.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12486
--- Comment #16 from joao.eiras joao.eiras@gmail.com 2008-07-09 02:40:30 --- I'm sure your patch works, and you can go further on with the installer, but this cannot be taken into the main tree, because: 1) this would afect all XML buffers, and not only office2007 ones, and could break others. We really need is some sotr of costumization on the libxml side. \r\n is the new line char sequence on windows, but you can have only \n or \r too. 2) you're doing 2 O(n) cycles, looping byte by byte, which adds a performance penalty
Good work though :)
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12486
--- Comment #17 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com 2008-07-09 04:46:09 --- (In reply to comment #15)
Created an attachment (id=14686)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=14686) [details]
Correctly format the xml for office 2007 This patch will allow the Installer to validated each of the XML documents.
A testcase would be very helpful in these convulted situations.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12486
--- Comment #18 from Alistair Leslie-Hughes leslie_alistair@hotmail.com 2008-07-09 05:48:58 ---
A testcase would be very helpful in these convulted situations.
Hmmm, the basic scenario is, all \n are changed to \r\n\t.
Using this example. <jjj>\n<HH>aa</HH><HH1>aa</HH1></jjj>
msxml3 produces <jjj> <HH>aa</HH><HH1>aa</HH1></jjj> <-- Note: all on one line
whereas libxml will produce <jjj> <HH>aa</HH> <HH1>aa</HH1> </jjj>
Using libxml we cannot reproduce formatting exactly.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12486
Alistair Leslie-Hughes leslie_alistair@hotmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |leslie_alistair@hotmail.com Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #19 from Alistair Leslie-Hughes leslie_alistair@hotmail.com 2008-07-28 17:37:47 --- A patch has been accept to fix this issue.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12486
Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--- Comment #20 from Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org 2008-08-22 10:46:19 --- Closing bugs fixed in 1.1.3.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12486
Anastasius Focht focht@gmx.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Installer Fixed by SHA1| |95660514d34709d89228ec84940 | |8f4205ea38f05 Version|unspecified |0.9.59.
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org