https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42277
Bug ID: 42277 Summary: d2d1/tests/d2d1.c test failure with "Surface does not match." Product: Wine Version: 2.0-rc6 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: d2d Assignee: wine-bugs@winehq.org Reporter: z.figura12@gmail.com Distribution: ---
Created attachment 56986 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=56986 log with +d2d,+d3d10
17 failures, all with the message "Test failed: Surface does not match." Log attached.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42277
Józef Kucia joseph.kucia@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |joseph.kucia@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Józef Kucia joseph.kucia@gmail.com --- (In reply to Zebediah Figura from comment #0)
Created attachment 56986 [details] log with +d2d,+d3d10
17 failures, all with the message "Test failed: Surface does not match." Log attached.
This is probably caused by ARB_viewport_array. Do you use Nvidia binary drivers?
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42277
--- Comment #2 from Zebediah Figura z.figura12@gmail.com --- (In reply to Józef Kucia from comment #1)
(In reply to Zebediah Figura from comment #0)
Created attachment 56986 [details] log with +d2d,+d3d10
17 failures, all with the message "Test failed: Surface does not match." Log attached.
This is probably caused by ARB_viewport_array. Do you use Nvidia binary drivers?
Yes, I do; sorry for not supplying that. Is this a duplicate of bug #41711?
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42277
Józef Kucia joseph.kucia@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |NOTOURBUG Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #3 from Józef Kucia joseph.kucia@gmail.com --- (In reply to Zebediah Figura from comment #2)
Yes, I do; sorry for not supplying that. Is this a duplicate of bug #41711?
No, it's a bug in Nvidia drivers (incorrect value is returned for GL_VIEWPORT_SUBPIXEL_BITS).
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42277
Józef Kucia joseph.kucia@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|d2d |directx-d3d
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42277
--- Comment #4 from Zebediah Figura z.figura12@gmail.com --- Rerunning tests on 2.7 I don't get the above failures anymore (presumably due to 6823abd521c0c12d20d9171fb5ae8b300009d082) but I do get the following failures:
d2d1.c:4012: Test failed: Figure does not match. d2d1.c:4020: Test failed: Figure does not match. d2d1.c:4039: Test failed: Figure does not match. d2d1.c:4062: Test failed: Figure does not match.
Is this related? Should I file a new bug?
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42277
--- Comment #5 from Henri Verbeet hverbeet@gmail.com --- (In reply to Zebediah Figura from comment #4)
Rerunning tests on 2.7 I don't get the above failures anymore (presumably due to 6823abd521c0c12d20d9171fb5ae8b300009d082) but I do get the following failures:
d2d1.c:4012: Test failed: Figure does not match. d2d1.c:4020: Test failed: Figure does not match. d2d1.c:4039: Test failed: Figure does not match. d2d1.c:4062: Test failed: Figure does not match.
Is this related? Should I file a new bug?
It's probably unrelated. If you run the tests as
make d2d1.ok RUNTESTFLAGS="-P wine" WINEDEBUG=-all
it should show how much the figure differs from the expected result. It may only be a matter of increasing the tolerance, but it may also be something more complicated.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42277
--- Comment #6 from Józef Kucia joseph.kucia@gmail.com --- Created attachment 58269 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=58269 d2d1 test failures
21 test failures with Nvidia binary drivers
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42277
--- Comment #7 from Zebediah Figura z.figura12@gmail.com --- (In reply to Józef Kucia from comment #6)
Created attachment 58269 [details] d2d1 test failures
21 test failures with Nvidia binary drivers
I get identical results to these, for what it's worth.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42277
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--- Comment #8 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com --- Closing.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42277
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #9 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com --- This was inadvertently caught up in my unclosed bugs filter. NOTOURBUG should only be closed when fixed upstream.
Setting back to RESOLVED NOTOURBUG.
Sorry for the spam.