https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56293
Bug ID: 56293 Summary: user32:msg test_recursive_hook fails on Windows 7 Product: Wine Version: 9.1 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: user32 Assignee: wine-bugs@winehq.org Reporter: madewokherd@gmail.com
https://test.winehq.org/data/tests/user32:msg.html is failing in test_recursive_hook since Jan 18 with:
msg.c:12680: Test failed: Got expected 16.
This is a new test introduced by 3c9e57d57f6d8bdb2cadbff6fa31cb41b058454f. I haven't looked in detail, but I guess the behavior is just different on Windows 7?
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56293
Esme Povirk madewokherd@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |madewokherd@gmail.com, | |zzhang@codeweavers.com URL| |https://test.winehq.org/dat | |a/tests/user32:msg.html Keywords| |download, source, testcase Regression SHA1| |3c9e57d57f6d8bdb2cadbff6fa3 | |1cb41b058454f
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56293
Zhiyi Zhang zzhang@codeweavers.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|wine-bugs@winehq.org |zzhang@codeweavers.com
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56293
--- Comment #1 from Zhiyi Zhang zzhang@codeweavers.com --- Thanks for spotting this. Windows 7 just has a lower maximum depth for recursive hooks. I submitted https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/5019 to fix this.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56293
Zhiyi Zhang zzhang@codeweavers.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|zzhang@codeweavers.com |wine-bugs@winehq.org
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56293
Esme Povirk madewokherd@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed by SHA1| |d6dc917232b170cca2c0e4d9285 | |a1b2bcb447214 Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #2 from Esme Povirk madewokherd@gmail.com --- Thanks, looking at test data this appears to be fixed.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56293
Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--- Comment #3 from Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org --- Closing bugs fixed in 9.2.