http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11494
Summary: The Install does not work, acts like it finises though Product: Wine Version: 0.9.54. Platform: PC-x86-64 URL: http://www.speedproject.de/enu/speedcommander/index.html OS/Version: other Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs@winehq.org ReportedBy: tn@chambers.no-ip.info
Created an attachment (id=10648) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=10648) First screen
I don't know if it's because of the installer it uses, but take a look through the pictures and you can see that it doesn't install into the correct directory, and at the end of the install you only get an uninstall.exe in the Default folder. By the way, the Default install path for this program is Program files/SpeedProject/SpeedCommander 12/ instead of this wierd Program Files/Default. I have tried manually changing the install directory to the correct one but it never copies the correct file into the folder. I have attached all pics from the install process for reference. Not sure if this install is tied to the bug from 11490. Thank you.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11494
--- Comment #1 from Thom tn@chambers.no-ip.info 2008-02-06 14:17:56 --- Created an attachment (id=10649) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=10649) Second
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11494
--- Comment #2 from Thom tn@chambers.no-ip.info 2008-02-06 14:18:19 --- Created an attachment (id=10650) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=10650) Third
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11494
--- Comment #3 from Thom tn@chambers.no-ip.info 2008-02-06 14:18:38 --- Created an attachment (id=10651) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=10651) Fourth
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11494
--- Comment #4 from Thom tn@chambers.no-ip.info 2008-02-06 14:19:17 --- Created an attachment (id=10652) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=10652) Fifth - The install dir with only uninstall.exe
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11494
--- Comment #5 from Thom tn@chambers.no-ip.info 2008-02-06 14:19:39 --- Created an attachment (id=10653) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=10653) Terminal Output - Not much info?
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11494
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Keywords| |download, Installer Summary|The Install does not work, |Speed Commander 12 does not |acts like it finises though |install
--- Comment #6 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com 2008-02-06 15:08:46 --- http://www.sp-download.de/sc12/sc12u.exe
Confirming. Though, I'm getting some different results in current git. Installer crashes for me, doesn't pretend to finish. The unintall.exe is there, however. Terminal output is short:
err:ntdll:RtlpWaitForCriticalSection section 0x13158c "animate.c: ANIMATE_INFO*->cs" wait timed out in thread 0016, blocked by 001a, retrying (60 sec) wine: Critical section 0013158c wait failed at address 0x7ef967f0 (thread 0016), starting debugger... Unhandled exception: wait failed on critical section 0x0013158c err:seh:raise_exception Unhandled exception code c0000194 flags 0 addr 0x7ef967f0 fixme:exec:SHELL_execute flags ignored: 0x00000400 Process of pid=0015 has terminated
I'll attach the backtrace.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11494
--- Comment #7 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com 2008-02-06 15:09:37 --- Created an attachment (id=10655) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=10655) Backtrace in current git.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11494
--- Comment #8 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com 2008-02-06 15:12:34 --- (In reply to comment #7)
Created an attachment (id=10655)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=10655) [details]
Backtrace in current git.
Ignore these past two comments. They're a separate bug. I tested in wine 0.9.54, however, and THIS bug is valid/confirmed. I'll file a separate bug for that one.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11494
--- Comment #9 from Anastasius Focht focht@gmx.net 2008-02-06 16:45:09 --- Created an attachment (id=10656) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=10656) patch which fixes Profile_Open file access attributes bug
Hello,
the installer writes out a temporary ini-style file from its resources with delete-on-close semantics (FILE_FLAG_DELETE_ON_CLOSE). Wine's profile API -> Profile_Open() doesn't honour this, failing to open the temporary file (share flags) returning "Default" value. The solution is to open the profile file with FILE_SHARE_READ | FILE_SHARE_DELETE by default.
Attached patch fixes this problem and lets the installer successfully finish.
SC12 later crashes on other issues, unimplemented shell32 apis. You should file separate bug reports for that.
Regards
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11494
--- Comment #10 from Thom tn@chambers.no-ip.info 2008-02-09 22:13:08 --- (In reply to comment #9)
Created an attachment (id=10656)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=10656) [details]
patch which fixes Profile_Open file access attributes bug
Hello,
the installer writes out a temporary ini-style file from its resources with delete-on-close semantics (FILE_FLAG_DELETE_ON_CLOSE). Wine's profile API -> Profile_Open() doesn't honour this, failing to open the temporary file (share flags) returning "Default" value. The solution is to open the profile file with FILE_SHARE_READ | FILE_SHARE_DELETE by default.
Attached patch fixes this problem and lets the installer successfully finish.
SC12 later crashes on other issues, unimplemented shell32 apis. You should file separate bug reports for that.
Regards
Thanks so much, I don't know much about compiling and using diff files. Will this fix make it to the next release?
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11494
--- Comment #11 from Thom tn@chambers.no-ip.info 2008-03-31 15:17:14 --- I am running WINE 0.9.58 and I notice this behavior still exists. What needs to be done to commit this patch to the production code?
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11494
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |patch
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11494
Anastasius Focht focht@gmx.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |focht@gmx.net
--- Comment #12 from Anastasius Focht focht@gmx.net 2008-03-31 17:18:44 --- Hello,
--- quote --- I am running WINE 0.9.58 and I notice this behavior still exists. What needs to be done to commit this patch to the production code? --- quote ---
depends. For such a change, an additional conformance test might be needed.
Writing CT should be a no-brainer with the information I gave.
Example: Create a temp ini file with delete-on-close semantics (FILE_FLAG_DELETE_ON_CLOSE), containing sample data and then call one of the ini file APIs on it (GetPrivateProfileString, ..) reading existing values.
Regards
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11494
--- Comment #13 from Thom tn@chambers.no-ip.info 2008-04-01 14:42:04 --- Hi Anastasius, I am not a coder and am pretty much a noob for linux so I'm not even sure what you mean by trying those things. I put the bug in hoping that it would get Wine closer to running windows apps without problems. I guess at this point I'm not sure what to do to get this approved but can only hope the project maintainers see that you submitted a patch that fixes it and will put it in the next wine version. Thank you again for your help!
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11494
--- Comment #14 from Thom tn@chambers.no-ip.info 2008-06-03 16:35:45 --- Could this patch be applied before 1.0 is released? It's still a problem with 1.0 rc3
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11494
--- Comment #15 from Thom tn@chambers.no-ip.info 2008-06-07 11:08:21 --- Just tried with 1.0 rc4 amd it's still an issue, thank you
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11494
Louis Lenders xerox_xerox2000@yahoo.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xerox_xerox2000@yahoo.co.uk Component|-unknown |kernel32
--- Comment #16 from Louis Lenders xerox_xerox2000@yahoo.co.uk 2008-06-07 11:22:15 --- i guess this needs a testcase. I'll see if i can add a testcase later this week.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11494
--- Comment #17 from Thom tn@chambers.no-ip.info 2008-06-19 08:50:23 --- Just an FYI that this is still a bug in 1.0. Should I keep testing on all released versions to see if progress is made? I don't want to spam people's mailboxes
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11494
Louis Lenders xerox_xerox2000@yahoo.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|--- |1.0.1
--- Comment #18 from Louis Lenders xerox_xerox2000@yahoo.co.uk 2008-06-19 09:20:28 ---
Should I keep testing on all released versions to see if progress is made?
Not really necessary. I'm a it limited in time to look into this. But i'll set it as a target for wine-1.0.1 as the bug+solution seems to be completely clear
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11494
Louis Lenders xerox_xerox2000@yahoo.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|--- |1.0.1
--- Comment #18 from Louis Lenders xerox_xerox2000@yahoo.co.uk 2008-06-19 09:20:28 ---
Should I keep testing on all released versions to see if progress is made?
Not really necessary. I'm a it limited in time to look into this. But i'll set it as a target for wine-1.0.1 as the bug+solution seems to be completely clear
--- Comment #19 from Louis Lenders xerox_xerox2000@yahoo.co.uk 2008-06-19 09:20:46 ---
Should I keep testing on all released versions to see if progress is made?
Not really necessary. I'm a it limited in time to look into this. But i'll set it as a target for wine-1.0.1 as the bug+solution seems to be completely clear
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11494
Louis Lenders xerox_xerox2000@yahoo.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|--- |1.0.1
--- Comment #18 from Louis Lenders xerox_xerox2000@yahoo.co.uk 2008-06-19 09:20:28 ---
Should I keep testing on all released versions to see if progress is made?
Not really necessary. I'm a it limited in time to look into this. But i'll set it as a target for wine-1.0.1 as the bug+solution seems to be completely clear
--- Comment #19 from Louis Lenders xerox_xerox2000@yahoo.co.uk 2008-06-19 09:20:46 ---
Should I keep testing on all released versions to see if progress is made?
Not really necessary. I'm a it limited in time to look into this. But i'll set it as a target for wine-1.0.1 as the bug+solution seems to be completely clear
--- Comment #20 from Louis Lenders xerox_xerox2000@yahoo.co.uk 2008-06-19 09:21:54 ---
Should I keep testing on all released versions to see if progress is made?
Not really necessary. I'm a it limited in time to look into this. But i'll set it as a target for wine-1.0.1 as the bug+solution seems to be completely clear
--- Comment #21 from Thom tn@chambers.no-ip.info 2008-07-16 13:01:55 --- I hate to be a pest but this is a still a problem with 1.1.1, sorry
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11494
L. Rahyen mail@science.su changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mail@science.su
--- Comment #22 from L. Rahyen mail@science.su 2008-07-17 22:56:50 ---
But i'll set it as a target for wine-1.0.1 as the bug+solution seems to be completely clear
I hate to be a pest but this is a still a problem with 1.1.1, sorry
1.1.1 != 1.0.1; see "Task List" for "Wine 1.0.1" right under WineHQ menu on the bugzilla in order to see bugs that are expected (but not guaranteed) to be solved in 1.0.1.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11494
Michael Karcher wine@mkarcher.dialup.fu-berlin.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wine@mkarcher.dialup.fu- | |berlin.de
--- Comment #23 from Michael Karcher wine@mkarcher.dialup.fu-berlin.de 2008-08-17 12:06:11 --- patch submitted to wine-patches, see http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2008-August/059543.html
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11494
Detlef Riekenberg wine.dev@web.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #24 from Detlef Riekenberg wine.dev@web.de 2008-09-12 09:45:45 --- Patch committed: http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/?a=commitdiff;h=33ca67dcab8e99d2fddbd2...
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11494
Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--- Comment #25 from Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org 2008-09-19 11:17:06 --- Closing bugs fixed in 1.1.5.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11494
Anastasius Focht focht@gmx.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed by SHA1| |33ca67dcab8e99d2fddbd2d3a11 | |d73b21ba0ef41