http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15920
Summary: Switching to an interlaced video mode (in some games) Product: Wine Version: 1.1.7 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs@winehq.org ReportedBy: sandburg@netcourrier.com
I'm (still) using a CRT screen. The only one resolution set in my config file (/etc/X11/xorg.conf) is 1024x768 85Hz non interlaced - 24 bits color In some games (list below), I set the resolution to the one of my settings (1027x768) and I obtain this resolution BUT interlaced. (And I don't want that)
I guess to obtain a non-interlaced refresh, but in place of that... it is interlaced.
This appends in 2 games : Wakfu World of Goo
What really surprises me, is that I know the source code of Wakfu (I am developper by Ankama) and I know the resolution asked to the interface tier is not interlaced. So I think it comes from Wine...
Extract of xorg.conf :
Section "Screen" Identifier "Screen0" Device "Videocard0" Monitor "Monitor0" DefaultDepth 24 Option "TwinView" "0" Option "metamodes" "1024x768 +0+0; nvidia-auto-select +0+0" EndSection
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15920
--- Comment #1 from Vitaliy Margolen vitaliy@kievinfo.com 2008-11-06 08:51:28 --- Wine asks for the best matching resolution. Check output of 'xrandr' for the complete list of those resolutions.
Since you don't explicitly specify allowed resolutions in the xorg.conf you leave it up to X server and driver to pick them.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15920
--- Comment #2 from Germain Barret sandburg@netcourrier.com 2008-11-06 13:30:01 --- I'm also surprised... there is only one resolution attached to 1024*768 Subject still open...
~$ xrandr Screen 0: minimum 320 x 175, current 1024 x 768, maximum 1024 x 768 default connected 1024x768+0+0 0mm x 0mm 1024x768 50.0* 51.0 52.0 53.0 54.0 55.0 840x525 56.0 832x624 57.0 800x600 58.0 59.0 60.0 61.0 62.0 63.0 800x512 64.0 720x450 65.0 720x400 66.0 640x512 67.0 640x480 68.0 69.0 70.0 71.0 72.0 640x400 73.0 74.0 640x384 75.0 640x350 76.0 576x432 77.0 576x384 78.0 512x384 79.0 80.0 81.0 82.0 83.0 416x312 84.0 400x300 85.0 86.0 87.0 88.0 89.0 360x200 90.0 320x240 91.0 92.0 93.0 94.0 320x200 95.0 320x175 96.0
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15920
--- Comment #3 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com 2009-05-06 05:40:42 --- Is this still an issue in current (1.1.20 or newer) wine?
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15920
--- Comment #4 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com 2009-11-19 12:24:37 --- Probably still present.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15920
--- Comment #5 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com 2010-12-20 22:15:53 CST --- This is your friendly reminder that there has been no bug activity for a year. Is this still an issue in current (1.3.9 or newer) wine?
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15920
butraxz@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |butraxz@gmail.com
--- Comment #6 from butraxz@gmail.com 2013-04-21 14:28:30 CDT --- No update for over 900 days. Is still an issue with 1.5.28 or higher ? Or should this be closed as abandoned as this is a second request to update this.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15920
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |ABANDONED
--- Comment #7 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com 2013-04-22 20:37:56 CDT --- Abandoned.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15920
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--- Comment #8 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com 2013-04-22 21:13:23 CDT --- Closing.