[Bug 33253] New: Command line: Incorrect behavior of "for" command

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33253

Bug #: 33253
           Summary: Command line: Incorrect behavior of "for" command
           Product: Wine
           Version: 1.5.26
          Platform: x86
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: cmd
        AssignedTo: [e-mail]
        ReportedBy: [e-mail]
    Classification: Unclassified

Hi,

with wine 1.5.26 :

C:\OSGeo4W>for %f in (etc/ini/*.bat) do echo %f
gdal.bat

C:\OSGeo4W>for %f in (etc/ini/gdal.bat) do echo %f
etc/ini/gdal.bat

with windows XP :

C:\OSGeo4W>for %f in (etc\ini*.bat) do echo %f

C:\OSGeo4W>echo etc\ini\gdal.bat
etc\ini\gdal.bat

C:\OSGeo4W>for %f in (etc\ini\gdal.bat) do echo %f

C:\OSGeo4W>echo etc\ini\gdal.bat
etc\ini\gdal.bat

Thank you,

Guy

[Bug 33253] Command line: Incorrect behavior of "for" command

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33253

Jason Edmeades  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]

--- Comment #1 from Jason Edmeades  2013-06-03 17:04:57 CDT ---
Ah... Just looking into the difference noted below. Be aware you have not
compared like with like and using the unix slashes even changes the behaviour
(although there is a bug/difference here):

(Windows 7)
E:\VMShared\bugs\33253>for %f in (etc/ini/*.bat) do echo %f
E:\VMShared\bugs\33253>echo gdal.bat
gdal.bat
E:\VMShared\bugs\33253>for %f in (etc\ini*.bat) do echo %f
E:\VMShared\bugs\33253>echo etc\ini\gdal.bat
etc\ini\gdal.bat

I will use this bug to concentrate on the reason the below command is missing
the path when run in wine compared to windows
for %f in (etc\ini*.bat) do echo %f

[Bug 33253] Command line: Incorrect behavior of "for" command

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33253

Jason Edmeades  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
         AssignedTo|[e-mail]        |[e-mail]
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #2 from Jason Edmeades  2013-06-03 18:32:38 CDT ---
Attaching patch which solves this + tests (and keeps the unix behaviour as-is
too)

[Bug 33253] Command line: Incorrect behavior of "for" command

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33253

--- Comment #3 from Jason Edmeades  2013-06-03 18:33:32 CDT ---
Created attachment 44651
  --> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=44651
Patch for reported problem

[Bug 33253] Command line: Incorrect behavior of "for" command

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33253

--- Comment #4 from Jason Edmeades  2013-06-04 16:11:51 CDT ---
Submitted
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2013-June/124604.html

[Bug 33253] Command line: Incorrect behavior of "for" command

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33253

Jason Edmeades  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Fixed by SHA1|                            |a5b1172e90de94234b2799d26cc
                   |                            |c36a752bdd7eb
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #5 from Jason Edmeades  2013-06-05 15:13:33 CDT ---
Committed

[Bug 33253] Command line: Incorrect behavior of "for" command

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33253

Alexandre Julliard  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |CLOSED

--- Comment #6 from Alexandre Julliard  2013-06-07 15:02:08 CDT ---
Closing bugs fixed in 1.6-rc1.