http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16395
Summary: winetest should recover if it somehow brings down the OS Product: Wine Version: 1.1.10 Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: programs AssignedTo: wine-bugs@winehq.org ReportedBy: madewokherd@gmail.com
It seems the ddraw:d3d tests cause my machine to reboot. While it would be nice to fix them or skip that test somehow, this shouldn't stop me from running the test suite. Winetest should be able to resume the tests where it left off when the machine starts again and make a note that a particular test apparently brought down the system.
Windows has an API for this sort of thing: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc948909(VS.85).aspx
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16395
--- Comment #1 from Jeff Zaroyko jeffz@jeffz.name 2008-12-07 18:24:36 --- do you have an ati card? if so that's bug 13608
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16395
--- Comment #2 from Vincent Povirk madewokherd@gmail.com 2008-12-07 18:28:03 --- I do. But I maintain I should be able to run the tests anyway.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16395
Jeff Zaroyko jeffz@jeffz.name changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from Jeff Zaroyko jeffz@jeffz.name 2008-12-07 18:50:04 --- (In reply to comment #2)
I do. But I maintain I should be able to run the tests anyway.
certainly a good idea.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16395
Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@codeweavers.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #4 from Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@codeweavers.com 2008-12-09 04:07:41 --- File a bug with ATI/AMD.
Duplicate.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 13608 ***
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16395
Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@codeweavers.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--- Comment #5 from Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@codeweavers.com 2008-12-09 04:08:02 --- Closing dup.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16395
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |austinenglish@gmail.com Status|CLOSED |REOPENED Resolution|DUPLICATE |
--- Comment #6 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com 2008-12-09 04:32:09 --- This bug is more generic than the ATI test failing. If some other test fails and causes the box to reboot, we should be able to recover and carry on the rest of the tests.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16395
--- Comment #7 from Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@codeweavers.com 2008-12-09 05:31:03 --- (In reply to comment #6)
This bug is more generic than the ATI test failing. If some other test fails and causes the box to reboot, we should be able to recover and carry on the rest of the tests.
That's unreasonable to require from a simple tool launcher. If the box reboots, that's the problem to fix.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16395
--- Comment #8 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com 2008-12-09 11:26:48 --- (In reply to comment #7)
(In reply to comment #6)
This bug is more generic than the ATI test failing. If some other test fails and causes the box to reboot, we should be able to recover and carry on the rest of the tests.
That's unreasonable to require from a simple tool launcher. If the box reboots, that's the problem to fix.
That's why it's labeled enhancement :-)
I don't think it's a high priority either, but if someone wants to implement it, I think it is a reasonable goal.
If consensus is against it, then close this bug. But I felt that was done a bit hastily.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16395
--- Comment #9 from Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@codeweavers.com 2008-12-10 01:26:26 --- I don't think Alexandre will ever accept that. How could he test that?
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16395
--- Comment #10 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com 2008-12-10 01:34:42 --- How about instead making it a dupe of bug 13029? Those users with ATI cards (or any other test that triggers a buggy driver) could still run the rest of the conformance suite, and selectively disable the buggy test(s).
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16395
--- Comment #11 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com 2009-06-10 11:28:54 --- Ping.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16395
--- Comment #12 from Vincent Povirk madewokherd@gmail.com 2009-06-10 11:30:58 --- I don't run tests on the affected machine anymore. You can close this as ABANDONED if you like.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16395
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |ABANDONED
--- Comment #13 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com 2009-06-10 11:32:52 --- Fair enough.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16395
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--- Comment #14 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com 2009-06-10 11:38:27 --- Closing.
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org