http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18385
Summary: fr-041_debris Postprocessing offset and too big Product: Wine Version: 1.1.20 Platform: PC-x86-64 URL: http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=30244 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs@winehq.org ReportedBy: roothorick@new.rr.com
Created an attachment (id=20966) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=20966) Screenshot displaying the issue.
I think the problem is fairly obvious from the screenshot (attached). Log to come.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18385
--- Comment #1 from Ben Anderson roothorick@new.rr.com 2009-05-07 16:52:56 --- Created an attachment (id=20967) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=20967) and log.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18385
Ben Anderson roothorick@new.rr.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #20967|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| |
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18385
--- Comment #2 from H. Verbeet hverbeet@gmail.com 2009-05-08 02:53:00 --- Are you using FBOs? This seems to work for me on an nvidia card, although it does suffer ffrom bug 13335 a bit.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18385
--- Comment #3 from Ben Anderson roothorick@new.rr.com 2009-05-09 03:03:30 --- Good call! Rendering is more or less correct with OffscreenRenderingMode=backbuffer, except for part of (what is presumably) the offscreen rendering appearing in the black bar above the image. However, performance takes a HUGE hit (5-15fps versus 45+).
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18385
--- Comment #4 from Ben Anderson roothorick@new.rr.com 2009-05-09 03:07:13 --- I just realized I never mentioned: Radeon HD 4850, Catalyst 9.4.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18385
--- Comment #5 from H. Verbeet hverbeet@gmail.com 2009-05-09 05:02:13 --- This could be a bug in AMD's FBO handling, although it's hard to debug remotely. With FBO's enabled, does disabling EXT_framebuffer_blit by commenting out http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/?a=blob;f=dlls/wined3d/directx.c;h=d1f... make any difference?
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18385
--- Comment #6 from Ben Anderson roothorick@new.rr.com 2009-05-09 17:34:46 --- Yeah, that tweak made rendering correct. But performance went into the toilet. Also windows turned black in certain scenes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18385
--- Comment #7 from H. Verbeet hverbeet@gmail.com 2009-05-12 03:21:31 --- Created an attachment (id=21047) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=21047) fbo test
Could you post a screenshot with the output from this program? Compile with "gcc fbo_blit.c -o fbo_blit -lGL -lglut".
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18385
--- Comment #8 from Ben Anderson roothorick@new.rr.com 2009-05-12 08:35:07 --- It doesn't compile, neither against ATI or Xorg libGL.
roothorick@thebeast ~/tmp $ gcc fbo_blit.c -o fbo_blit -lGL -lglut /tmp/ccauQjSm.o: In function `display': fbo_blit.c:(.text+0x38d): undefined reference to `glBlitFramebufferEXT' fbo_blit.c:(.text+0x3d1): undefined reference to `glBlitFramebufferEXT' fbo_blit.c:(.text+0x415): undefined reference to `glBlitFramebufferEXT' fbo_blit.c:(.text+0x459): undefined reference to `glBlitFramebufferEXT' fbo_blit.c:(.text+0x49d): undefined reference to `glBlitFramebufferEXT' /tmp/ccauQjSm.o:fbo_blit.c:(.text+0x4e1): more undefined references to `glBlitFramebufferEXT' follow collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18385
H. Verbeet hverbeet@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #21047|0 |1 is obsolete| |
--- Comment #9 from H. Verbeet hverbeet@gmail.com 2009-05-12 09:35:31 --- Created an attachment (id=21052) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=21052) fbo_test
I think at least the fglrx libGL should have that export. Either way, does this one work any better?
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18385
--- Comment #10 from Ben Anderson roothorick@new.rr.com 2009-05-12 17:19:16 --- Created an attachment (id=21061) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=21061) fbo_test result
That one compiled and ran. And here's the result.
On the console, it outputs one line: fbo_blit @ 0x7f0bd1a62ef0
That number doesn't appear to change.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18385
--- Comment #11 from H. Verbeet hverbeet@gmail.com 2009-05-13 00:39:14 --- That looks correct, so at least the basic EXT_framebuffer_blit functionality appears to work. Unfortunately, that also means it won't be easy for me to figure out what's wrong without having the appropriate hardware.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18385
--- Comment #12 from Ben Anderson roothorick@new.rr.com 2009-05-13 13:05:21 --- If it helps any, 2400PROs can be had for as little as $30, maybe less, and they use the exact same driver.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18385
--- Comment #13 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com 2009-11-19 12:53:32 --- This is your friendly reminder that there has been no bug activity for 6 months. Is this still an issue in current (1.1.33 or newer) wine?
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18385
--- Comment #14 from Ben Anderson roothorick@new.rr.com 2009-11-24 07:33:41 --- Not working period now ("encountered a problem and needs to close" during loading). Strangely, the audio keeps going.
I'm guessing I should file a new bug for that?
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18385
--- Comment #15 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com 2009-11-24 11:13:35 --- (In reply to comment #14)
Not working period now ("encountered a problem and needs to close" during loading). Strangely, the audio keeps going.
I'm guessing I should file a new bug for that?
Please.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18385
Wylda wylda@volny.cz changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wylda@volny.cz
--- Comment #16 from Wylda wylda@volny.cz 2010-04-17 18:21:45 ---
None of the described problems encountered under wine-1.1.43.
nVidia-195.36.15
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18385
Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@codeweavers.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #17 from Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@codeweavers.com 2010-04-19 23:02:46 --- Reported fixed.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18385
Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--- Comment #18 from Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org 2010-05-07 13:29:29 --- Closing bugs fixed in 1.1.44.