[Bug 16688] New: tests/rsaenh: array size smaller than bound length

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16688

Summary: tests/rsaenh: array size smaller than bound length
           Product: Wine
           Version: 1.1.11
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: OpenBSD
            Status: NEW
          Keywords: source, testcase
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P2
         Component: build-env
        AssignedTo: [e-mail]
        ReportedBy: [e-mail]

bash-3.2$ make
ccache gcc -c -I. -I. -I../../../include -I../../../include   -D_REENTRANT
-fPIC -Wall -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Wwrite-strings -Wpointer-arith
-I/usr/local/include -g -O2  -o rsaenh.o rsaenh.c
rsaenh.c: In function `test_block_cipher_modes':
rsaenh.c:462: warning: array size (23) smaller than bound length (24)

OpenBSD 4.4, gcc 3.3.5 (propolice)

[Bug 16688] tests/rsaenh: array size smaller than bound length

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16688

Juan Lang  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]

--- Comment #1 from Juan Lang   2009-11-11 15:45:11 ---
This was pretty minor, since reading past a static array will succeed when
there are more static data afterward, which there are in this case.  The extra
byte also wasn't encrypted, so the tests didn't actually depend on there being
a "magic" value in the last byte of abData.

Still, patch sent:
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2009-November/081202.html

[Bug 16688] tests/rsaenh: array size smaller than bound length

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16688

Austin English  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #2 from Austin English   2009-11-12 11:31:22 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> This was pretty minor, since reading past a static array will succeed when
> there are more static data afterward, which there are in this case.  The extra
> byte also wasn't encrypted, so the tests didn't actually depend on there being
> a "magic" value in the last byte of abData.

OpenBSD being a bit proactive ;-).
> Still, patch sent:
> http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2009-November/081202.html

Committed:
http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/?a=commitdiff;h=9369dfbab6554abed3bc3a...

Thanks!

[Bug 16688] tests/rsaenh: array size smaller than bound length

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16688

Alexandre Julliard  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |CLOSED

--- Comment #3 from Alexandre Julliard   2009-11-13 12:43:32 ---
Closing bugs fixed in 1.1.33.