http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7544
--- Comment #27 from Erich Hoover ehoover@mines.edu 2008-02-05 09:56:25 --- (In reply to comment #24)
Does someone know if this patch was applied ? and if not, why ? It would be a shame that a patch which obviously solves a problem stays buried in he abyss af the bugzilla.
No, I have submitted several different versions of this patch and only rarely received responses with respect to things that should be changed. The last email I sent to wine-devel apparently got lost, I'll have to resend it. I was wondering why I never got a response this time around.
(In reply to comment #25)
Created an attachment (id=10613)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=10613) [details]
new preposed patch
If Alexandre would have permitted using Windows API calls then this would have been patched a long time ago. That is why the latest patch is different from the older ones, see http://winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2007-October/059948.html for details.
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org