http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Summary: start.exe http://someurl/ does not work Product: Wine Version: 1.0-rc4 Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: programs AssignedTo: wine-bugs@winehq.org ReportedBy: thestig@google.com
When I run ~/wine/wine-git/wine start http://www.google.com/
I get: fixme:exec:SHELL_execute flags ignored: 0x00000500 err:winebrowser:get_url_from_dde Unabled to retrieve URL from string L""" err:winebrowser:wmain Usage: winebrowser URL
Whereas winebrowser should launch and take me to google.com
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
--- Comment #1 from Hans Leidekker hans@it.vu.nl 2008-06-14 08:22:36 --- Created an attachment (id=13999) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=13999) winebrowser: Don't convert URL if DDE conversation partner uses CP_WINUNICODE.
This patch might fix it if we'd support querying remote conversation information in our DDE implementation.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |patch
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Louis Lenders xerox_xerox2000@yahoo.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xerox_xerox2000@yahoo.co.uk Severity|enhancement |major Keywords| |regression
--- Comment #2 from Louis Lenders xerox_xerox2000@yahoo.co.uk 2008-06-26 09:38:49 --- This bug is rather annoying and affects many applications i've seen sofar. Moreover, in former wine-versions like wine-0.9.52 it all worked fine. Hans, the patch attached here does not help, any chance of a quick fix soon?
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Hans Leidekker hans@it.vu.nl changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hans@it.vu.nl
--- Comment #3 from Hans Leidekker hans@it.vu.nl 2008-06-26 14:19:37 --- Like I said, the patch I attached depends on support for DDE remote conversation information. This means we need to marshall a CONVINFO structure from one process to another but I'm not sure what mechanism would be appropriate here.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
ne4@parsoma.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ne4@parsoma.net
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
ariana strangelove astrangelove@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |astrangelove@gmail.com
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Dan Kegel dank@kegel.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dank@kegel.com
--- Comment #4 from Dan Kegel dank@kegel.com 2008-07-08 17:11:05 --- This seems to affect the app Duelpro, http://www.download.com/Duelpro-2008/3000-2121_4-10496698.html?hhTest
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
--- Comment #5 from Dan Kegel dank@kegel.com 2008-07-08 17:11:41 --- Forgot to mention: to reproduce with duelpro, do Online / Go to Website
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Vlastimil Babka caster@gentoo.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |caster@gentoo.org
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Johan Dahlin jdahlin@async.com.br changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jdahlin@async.com.br
--- Comment #6 from Johan Dahlin jdahlin@async.com.br 2008-07-30 03:08:25 --- This also affects Microsofts Platform SDK, available at http://www.microsoft.com/msdownload/platformsdk/sdkupdate/psdk-full.htm
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Sasha sashachaos@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sashachaos@gmail.com
--- Comment #7 from Sasha sashachaos@gmail.com 2008-07-30 12:16:04 --- And what with this bug? I used old wine, than i upgraded it to wine-1.0 and get this problem:
err:winebrowser:get_url_from_dde Unabled to retrieve URL from string L""" err:winebrowser:wmain Usage: winebrowser URL
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
--- Comment #8 from Zak Owen megsuma@gmail.com 2008-08-15 13:20:10 --- Created an attachment (id=15438) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=15438) WineDbg output
I'm experiencing the same issue in the 1.1.0 binary for Opensuse 11.0. I get
err:winebrowser:get_url_from_dde Unabled to retrieve URL from string L""" err:winebrowser:wmain Usage: winebrowser URL
when trying to launch Gunbound (NyxLauncher.exe). Also, the same happens when launching start.exe out of the windows/command/ folder. Attached is a little more output from a step throuhg WineDbg.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Zak Owen megsuma@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |megsuma@gmail.com
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
volle VollKoRn@googlemail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |VollKoRn@googlemail.com
--- Comment #9 from volle VollKoRn@googlemail.com 2008-08-25 20:12:42 --- Hi!
I'm getting the same message with the PokerStars- and FullTilt-Poker-Software when klicking on any link.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Geoff Wilson geoff@vorian.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |geoff@vorian.net
--- Comment #10 from Geoff Wilson geoff@vorian.net 2008-09-01 09:24:29 --- Workaround? - I've had the same issue/error message launching URL's from Forte Agent - however, appended a "%1" to HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\http\shell\open\command and now launches OK. (Also works with start.exe per bug description)
C:\windows\system32\winebrowser.exe -nohome "%1"
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
--- Comment #11 from volle VollKoRn@googlemail.com 2008-09-02 17:04:15 --- Great!
Just appended a "%1" to any line in system.reg containing winebrowser.exe and it works :)
Thank you!
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Vincent Povirk madewokherd@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |madewokherd@gmail.com
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Ruslan 10110111@mail.ru changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |10110111@mail.ru
--- Comment #12 from Ruslan 10110111@mail.ru 2008-11-21 18:13:40 ---
Just appended a "%1" to any line in system.reg containing winebrowser.exe and
it works :)
Yes, it really helps. I used this command in vi system.reg: :%s/winebrowser.exe -nohome/winebrowser.exe -nohome %1"/
and saved. Then restarted application under wine and it works! :)
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
--- Comment #13 from Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org 2008-12-06 10:18:00 --- *** Bug 16369 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
--- Comment #14 from Vitaliy Margolen vitaliy@kievinfo.com 2008-12-19 09:10:57 --- *** Bug 16303 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Dan Kegel dank@kegel.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|--- |1.2.0
--- Comment #15 from Dan Kegel dank@kegel.com 2008-12-19 09:25:00 --- This is very common, and we have proposed fixes (in comment #1 and at http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2008-December/065665.html ) Nominating for 1.2.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |Ronny.Standtke@gmx.net
--- Comment #16 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com 2008-12-28 08:36:02 --- *** Bug 16654 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Dan Kegel dank@kegel.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|start.exe http://someurl/ |start.exe http://someurl/ |does not work |does not work (affects any | |app that invokes external | |browser, e.g. Google | |Sketchup)
--- Comment #17 from Dan Kegel dank@kegel.com 2008-12-31 12:04:33 --- The patch fixes the "Help / Video Tutorials" menu item in Google Sketchup 6.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |msclrhd@gmail.com
--- Comment #18 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com 2009-01-02 14:18:16 --- *** Bug 16712 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andre.kjellstrup@gmail.com
--- Comment #19 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com 2009-01-28 18:03:07 --- *** Bug 17178 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Stuart Middleton Stuart@houseofanime.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |Stuart@houseofanime.org
--- Comment #20 from Stuart Middleton Stuart@houseofanime.org 2009-02-13 14:57:42 --- *** Bug 17079 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Vitaliy Margolen vitaliy@kievinfo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dendron2000@mail.ru
--- Comment #21 from Vitaliy Margolen vitaliy@kievinfo.com 2009-03-14 12:10:31 --- *** Bug 17725 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Ken Sharp kennybobs@o2.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kennybobs@o2.co.uk
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Dmitry V Ilyin wine@doty.ru changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wine@doty.ru
--- Comment #22 from Dmitry V Ilyin wine@doty.ru 2009-04-13 12:33:06 --- http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2008-December/065665.html -
Will be this patch applied to wine-git tree?
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
André H. nerv@dawncrow.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nerv@dawncrow.de
--- Comment #23 from André H. nerv@dawncrow.de 2009-04-14 14:03:21 --- or mine: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2009-April/071837.html but i am glad if anyone gets in
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
André H. nerv@dawncrow.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |7574
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
jsmith jsmith@argotecinc.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jsmith@argotecinc.com
--- Comment #24 from jsmith jsmith@argotecinc.com 2009-06-26 14:38:49 --- Test and verified the patch against the current git (wine-1.1.24-293-gdf1d04b). Fixed the problem on my system with launching URL. Would like to see this in the next beta version/added to the current git!!
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Jake Smith jsmith@argotecinc.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jsmith@argotecinc.com
--- Comment #24 from Jake Smith jsmith@argotecinc.com 2009-06-26 14:38:49 --- Test and verified the patch against the current git (wine-1.1.24-293-gdf1d04b). Fixed the problem on my system with launching URL. Would like to see this in the next beta version/added to the current git!!
--- Comment #25 from André H. nerv@dawncrow.de 2009-06-27 08:25:40 --- I already sent a better patch in may: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2009-May/073463.html
But it was not committed. They first want tests for mixed ansi/unicode DDE client/server. There are such tests, but still not committed, too.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Scott Ritchie scott@open-vote.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |scott@open-vote.org
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Ken Sharp kennybobs@o2.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hello.adri@gmail.com
--- Comment #26 from Ken Sharp kennybobs@o2.co.uk 2009-07-11 10:38:59 --- *** Bug 19167 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Ken Sharp kennybobs@o2.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hello.adri@gmail.com
Todd Chester ToddAndMargo@verizon.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ToddAndMargo@verizon.net
--- Comment #26 from Ken Sharp kennybobs@o2.co.uk 2009-07-11 10:38:59 --- *** Bug 19167 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Ken Sharp kennybobs@o2.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hello.adri@gmail.com
Todd Chester ToddAndMargo@verizon.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ToddAndMargo@verizon.net
--- Comment #26 from Ken Sharp kennybobs@o2.co.uk 2009-07-11 10:38:59 --- *** Bug 19167 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--- Comment #27 from André H. nerv@dawncrow.de 2009-07-28 12:56:21 --- Jeff Latimer added some tests for mixed ANSI/UNICODE DDE Actions as mentioned in: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2009-May/075989.html
So i think i will just resend my patch after AJs vacation.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Ken Sharp kennybobs@o2.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hello.adri@gmail.com
Todd Chester ToddAndMargo@verizon.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ToddAndMargo@verizon.net
--- Comment #26 from Ken Sharp kennybobs@o2.co.uk 2009-07-11 10:38:59 --- *** Bug 19167 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--- Comment #27 from André H. nerv@dawncrow.de 2009-07-28 12:56:21 --- Jeff Latimer added some tests for mixed ANSI/UNICODE DDE Actions as mentioned in: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2009-May/075989.html
So i think i will just resend my patch after AJs vacation.
--- Comment #28 from Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@codeweavers.com 2009-07-28 22:23:01 --- (In reply to comment #27)
Jeff Latimer added some tests for mixed ANSI/UNICODE DDE Actions as mentioned in: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2009-May/075989.html So i think i will just resend my patch after AJs vacation.
Your patch doesn't fix the source of the bug, and doesn't remove any 'todo' from the DDE test cases.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Ken Sharp kennybobs@o2.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hello.adri@gmail.com
Todd Chester ToddAndMargo@verizon.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ToddAndMargo@verizon.net
--- Comment #26 from Ken Sharp kennybobs@o2.co.uk 2009-07-11 10:38:59 --- *** Bug 19167 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--- Comment #27 from André H. nerv@dawncrow.de 2009-07-28 12:56:21 --- Jeff Latimer added some tests for mixed ANSI/UNICODE DDE Actions as mentioned in: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2009-May/075989.html
So i think i will just resend my patch after AJs vacation.
--- Comment #28 from Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@codeweavers.com 2009-07-28 22:23:01 --- (In reply to comment #27)
Jeff Latimer added some tests for mixed ANSI/UNICODE DDE Actions as mentioned in: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2009-May/075989.html So i think i will just resend my patch after AJs vacation.
Your patch doesn't fix the source of the bug, and doesn't remove any 'todo' from the DDE test cases.
--- Comment #29 from André H. nerv@dawncrow.de 2009-07-29 10:27:04 --- i didnt found critical todos in the dde-tests for mixed modes
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Ken Sharp kennybobs@o2.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hello.adri@gmail.com
Todd Chester ToddAndMargo@verizon.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ToddAndMargo@verizon.net
--- Comment #26 from Ken Sharp kennybobs@o2.co.uk 2009-07-11 10:38:59 --- *** Bug 19167 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--- Comment #27 from André H. nerv@dawncrow.de 2009-07-28 12:56:21 --- Jeff Latimer added some tests for mixed ANSI/UNICODE DDE Actions as mentioned in: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2009-May/075989.html
So i think i will just resend my patch after AJs vacation.
--- Comment #28 from Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@codeweavers.com 2009-07-28 22:23:01 --- (In reply to comment #27)
Jeff Latimer added some tests for mixed ANSI/UNICODE DDE Actions as mentioned in: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2009-May/075989.html So i think i will just resend my patch after AJs vacation.
Your patch doesn't fix the source of the bug, and doesn't remove any 'todo' from the DDE test cases.
--- Comment #29 from André H. nerv@dawncrow.de 2009-07-29 10:27:04 --- i didnt found critical todos in the dde-tests for mixed modes
--- Comment #30 from Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@codeweavers.com 2009-07-29 11:05:16 --- (In reply to comment #29)
i didnt found critical todos in the dde-tests for mixed modes
What about non-critical ones? :-) And in which connection did you mention existing DDE tests if your patch has nothing to do with them?
I'd suggest: 1. test Wine's start.exe+winebrowser.exe under Windows. If they work their, there is nothing to fix in them 2. add new DDE tests if existing ones don't have "critical todos" for you 3. fix all existing todos in DDE tests
Only once the above is done, and the source of the problem is well understood - start thinking about fixing it.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Ken Sharp kennybobs@o2.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hello.adri@gmail.com
Todd Chester ToddAndMargo@verizon.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ToddAndMargo@verizon.net
Ken Sharp kennybobs@o2.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |link111588@aol.com
--- Comment #26 from Ken Sharp kennybobs@o2.co.uk 2009-07-11 10:38:59 --- *** Bug 19167 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--- Comment #27 from André H. nerv@dawncrow.de 2009-07-28 12:56:21 --- Jeff Latimer added some tests for mixed ANSI/UNICODE DDE Actions as mentioned in: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2009-May/075989.html
So i think i will just resend my patch after AJs vacation.
--- Comment #28 from Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@codeweavers.com 2009-07-28 22:23:01 --- (In reply to comment #27)
Jeff Latimer added some tests for mixed ANSI/UNICODE DDE Actions as mentioned in: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2009-May/075989.html So i think i will just resend my patch after AJs vacation.
Your patch doesn't fix the source of the bug, and doesn't remove any 'todo' from the DDE test cases.
--- Comment #29 from André H. nerv@dawncrow.de 2009-07-29 10:27:04 --- i didnt found critical todos in the dde-tests for mixed modes
--- Comment #30 from Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@codeweavers.com 2009-07-29 11:05:16 --- (In reply to comment #29)
i didnt found critical todos in the dde-tests for mixed modes
What about non-critical ones? :-) And in which connection did you mention existing DDE tests if your patch has nothing to do with them?
I'd suggest: 1. test Wine's start.exe+winebrowser.exe under Windows. If they work their, there is nothing to fix in them 2. add new DDE tests if existing ones don't have "critical todos" for you 3. fix all existing todos in DDE tests
Only once the above is done, and the source of the problem is well understood - start thinking about fixing it.
--- Comment #31 from Ken Sharp kennybobs@o2.co.uk 2009-08-15 09:39:59 --- *** Bug 19731 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Ken Sharp kennybobs@o2.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hello.adri@gmail.com
Todd Chester ToddAndMargo@verizon.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ToddAndMargo@verizon.net
Ken Sharp kennybobs@o2.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |link111588@aol.com Keywords| |download URL| |http://download.bittorrent. | |com/dl/BitTorrent-6.2b.exe
--- Comment #26 from Ken Sharp kennybobs@o2.co.uk 2009-07-11 10:38:59 --- *** Bug 19167 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--- Comment #27 from André H. nerv@dawncrow.de 2009-07-28 12:56:21 --- Jeff Latimer added some tests for mixed ANSI/UNICODE DDE Actions as mentioned in: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2009-May/075989.html
So i think i will just resend my patch after AJs vacation.
--- Comment #28 from Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@codeweavers.com 2009-07-28 22:23:01 --- (In reply to comment #27)
Jeff Latimer added some tests for mixed ANSI/UNICODE DDE Actions as mentioned in: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2009-May/075989.html So i think i will just resend my patch after AJs vacation.
Your patch doesn't fix the source of the bug, and doesn't remove any 'todo' from the DDE test cases.
--- Comment #29 from André H. nerv@dawncrow.de 2009-07-29 10:27:04 --- i didnt found critical todos in the dde-tests for mixed modes
--- Comment #30 from Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@codeweavers.com 2009-07-29 11:05:16 --- (In reply to comment #29)
i didnt found critical todos in the dde-tests for mixed modes
What about non-critical ones? :-) And in which connection did you mention existing DDE tests if your patch has nothing to do with them?
I'd suggest: 1. test Wine's start.exe+winebrowser.exe under Windows. If they work their, there is nothing to fix in them 2. add new DDE tests if existing ones don't have "critical todos" for you 3. fix all existing todos in DDE tests
Only once the above is done, and the source of the problem is well understood - start thinking about fixing it.
--- Comment #31 from Ken Sharp kennybobs@o2.co.uk 2009-08-15 09:39:59 --- *** Bug 19731 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Ken Sharp kennybobs@o2.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hello.adri@gmail.com
Todd Chester ToddAndMargo@verizon.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ToddAndMargo@verizon.net
Ken Sharp kennybobs@o2.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |link111588@aol.com Keywords| |download URL| |http://download.bittorrent. | |com/dl/BitTorrent-6.2b.exe
Jeff Zaroyko jeffz@jeffz.name changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|ne4@parsoma.net |
--- Comment #26 from Ken Sharp kennybobs@o2.co.uk 2009-07-11 10:38:59 --- *** Bug 19167 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--- Comment #27 from André H. nerv@dawncrow.de 2009-07-28 12:56:21 --- Jeff Latimer added some tests for mixed ANSI/UNICODE DDE Actions as mentioned in: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2009-May/075989.html
So i think i will just resend my patch after AJs vacation.
--- Comment #28 from Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@codeweavers.com 2009-07-28 22:23:01 --- (In reply to comment #27)
Jeff Latimer added some tests for mixed ANSI/UNICODE DDE Actions as mentioned in: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2009-May/075989.html So i think i will just resend my patch after AJs vacation.
Your patch doesn't fix the source of the bug, and doesn't remove any 'todo' from the DDE test cases.
--- Comment #29 from André H. nerv@dawncrow.de 2009-07-29 10:27:04 --- i didnt found critical todos in the dde-tests for mixed modes
--- Comment #30 from Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@codeweavers.com 2009-07-29 11:05:16 --- (In reply to comment #29)
i didnt found critical todos in the dde-tests for mixed modes
What about non-critical ones? :-) And in which connection did you mention existing DDE tests if your patch has nothing to do with them?
I'd suggest: 1. test Wine's start.exe+winebrowser.exe under Windows. If they work their, there is nothing to fix in them 2. add new DDE tests if existing ones don't have "critical todos" for you 3. fix all existing todos in DDE tests
Only once the above is done, and the source of the problem is well understood - start thinking about fixing it.
--- Comment #31 from Ken Sharp kennybobs@o2.co.uk 2009-08-15 09:39:59 --- *** Bug 19731 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Ken Sharp kennybobs@o2.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hello.adri@gmail.com
Todd Chester ToddAndMargo@verizon.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ToddAndMargo@verizon.net
Ken Sharp kennybobs@o2.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |link111588@aol.com Keywords| |download URL| |http://download.bittorrent. | |com/dl/BitTorrent-6.2b.exe
Jeff Zaroyko jeffz@jeffz.name changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|ne4@parsoma.net |
Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ray@pobox.co.uk
--- Comment #26 from Ken Sharp kennybobs@o2.co.uk 2009-07-11 10:38:59 --- *** Bug 19167 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--- Comment #27 from André H. nerv@dawncrow.de 2009-07-28 12:56:21 --- Jeff Latimer added some tests for mixed ANSI/UNICODE DDE Actions as mentioned in: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2009-May/075989.html
So i think i will just resend my patch after AJs vacation.
--- Comment #28 from Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@codeweavers.com 2009-07-28 22:23:01 --- (In reply to comment #27)
Jeff Latimer added some tests for mixed ANSI/UNICODE DDE Actions as mentioned in: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2009-May/075989.html So i think i will just resend my patch after AJs vacation.
Your patch doesn't fix the source of the bug, and doesn't remove any 'todo' from the DDE test cases.
--- Comment #29 from André H. nerv@dawncrow.de 2009-07-29 10:27:04 --- i didnt found critical todos in the dde-tests for mixed modes
--- Comment #30 from Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@codeweavers.com 2009-07-29 11:05:16 --- (In reply to comment #29)
i didnt found critical todos in the dde-tests for mixed modes
What about non-critical ones? :-) And in which connection did you mention existing DDE tests if your patch has nothing to do with them?
I'd suggest: 1. test Wine's start.exe+winebrowser.exe under Windows. If they work their, there is nothing to fix in them 2. add new DDE tests if existing ones don't have "critical todos" for you 3. fix all existing todos in DDE tests
Only once the above is done, and the source of the problem is well understood - start thinking about fixing it.
--- Comment #31 from Ken Sharp kennybobs@o2.co.uk 2009-08-15 09:39:59 --- *** Bug 19731 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--- Comment #32 from Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org 2009-09-10 10:24:26 --- *** Bug 20003 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Ken Sharp kennybobs@o2.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hello.adri@gmail.com
Todd Chester ToddAndMargo@verizon.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ToddAndMargo@verizon.net
Ken Sharp kennybobs@o2.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |link111588@aol.com Keywords| |download URL| |http://download.bittorrent. | |com/dl/BitTorrent-6.2b.exe
Jeff Zaroyko jeffz@jeffz.name changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|ne4@parsoma.net |
Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ray@pobox.co.uk
Sylvain Petreolle spetreolle@yahoo.fr changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |spetreolle@yahoo.fr
--- Comment #26 from Ken Sharp kennybobs@o2.co.uk 2009-07-11 10:38:59 --- *** Bug 19167 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--- Comment #27 from André H. nerv@dawncrow.de 2009-07-28 12:56:21 --- Jeff Latimer added some tests for mixed ANSI/UNICODE DDE Actions as mentioned in: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2009-May/075989.html
So i think i will just resend my patch after AJs vacation.
--- Comment #28 from Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@codeweavers.com 2009-07-28 22:23:01 --- (In reply to comment #27)
Jeff Latimer added some tests for mixed ANSI/UNICODE DDE Actions as mentioned in: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2009-May/075989.html So i think i will just resend my patch after AJs vacation.
Your patch doesn't fix the source of the bug, and doesn't remove any 'todo' from the DDE test cases.
--- Comment #29 from André H. nerv@dawncrow.de 2009-07-29 10:27:04 --- i didnt found critical todos in the dde-tests for mixed modes
--- Comment #30 from Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@codeweavers.com 2009-07-29 11:05:16 --- (In reply to comment #29)
i didnt found critical todos in the dde-tests for mixed modes
What about non-critical ones? :-) And in which connection did you mention existing DDE tests if your patch has nothing to do with them?
I'd suggest: 1. test Wine's start.exe+winebrowser.exe under Windows. If they work their, there is nothing to fix in them 2. add new DDE tests if existing ones don't have "critical todos" for you 3. fix all existing todos in DDE tests
Only once the above is done, and the source of the problem is well understood - start thinking about fixing it.
--- Comment #31 from Ken Sharp kennybobs@o2.co.uk 2009-08-15 09:39:59 --- *** Bug 19731 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--- Comment #32 from Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org 2009-09-10 10:24:26 --- *** Bug 20003 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Ken Sharp kennybobs@o2.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hello.adri@gmail.com
Todd Chester ToddAndMargo@verizon.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ToddAndMargo@verizon.net
Ken Sharp kennybobs@o2.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |link111588@aol.com Keywords| |download URL| |http://download.bittorrent. | |com/dl/BitTorrent-6.2b.exe
Jeff Zaroyko jeffz@jeffz.name changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|ne4@parsoma.net |
Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ray@pobox.co.uk
Sylvain Petreolle spetreolle@yahoo.fr changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |spetreolle@yahoo.fr
André H. nerv@dawncrow.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |19594
--- Comment #26 from Ken Sharp kennybobs@o2.co.uk 2009-07-11 10:38:59 --- *** Bug 19167 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--- Comment #27 from André H. nerv@dawncrow.de 2009-07-28 12:56:21 --- Jeff Latimer added some tests for mixed ANSI/UNICODE DDE Actions as mentioned in: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2009-May/075989.html
So i think i will just resend my patch after AJs vacation.
--- Comment #28 from Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@codeweavers.com 2009-07-28 22:23:01 --- (In reply to comment #27)
Jeff Latimer added some tests for mixed ANSI/UNICODE DDE Actions as mentioned in: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2009-May/075989.html So i think i will just resend my patch after AJs vacation.
Your patch doesn't fix the source of the bug, and doesn't remove any 'todo' from the DDE test cases.
--- Comment #29 from André H. nerv@dawncrow.de 2009-07-29 10:27:04 --- i didnt found critical todos in the dde-tests for mixed modes
--- Comment #30 from Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@codeweavers.com 2009-07-29 11:05:16 --- (In reply to comment #29)
i didnt found critical todos in the dde-tests for mixed modes
What about non-critical ones? :-) And in which connection did you mention existing DDE tests if your patch has nothing to do with them?
I'd suggest: 1. test Wine's start.exe+winebrowser.exe under Windows. If they work their, there is nothing to fix in them 2. add new DDE tests if existing ones don't have "critical todos" for you 3. fix all existing todos in DDE tests
Only once the above is done, and the source of the problem is well understood - start thinking about fixing it.
--- Comment #31 from Ken Sharp kennybobs@o2.co.uk 2009-08-15 09:39:59 --- *** Bug 19731 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--- Comment #32 from Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org 2009-09-10 10:24:26 --- *** Bug 20003 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Chris Giles Chris.G.27@Gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |Chris.G.27@Gmail.com
--- Comment #33 from Chris Giles Chris.G.27@Gmail.com 2009-11-05 23:24:19 --- Since Geoff Wilson's comment (#10) resolves this issue, perhaps future releases of Wine just need to search for and replace instances of 'winebrowser.exe -nohome"' with 'winebrowser.exe -nohome %1' in the "system.reg" file.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
--- Comment #34 from Vitaliy Margolen vitaliy@kievinfo.com 2009-11-06 00:25:21 --- (In reply to comment #33) No, your solution will break some brilliant works of unnamed programmers who think the only browser in existence was, is and will always be IE6. That registry is set in stone and can not be altered in any way shape and form even by Microsoft themselves. That there is no such thing as API and everything have to be done by hand...
In short - some dumb programs take that registry entry, append URL to it and execute it. Obviously they don't know how to parse "%1" and this will result in invalid command line.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Vitaliy Margolen vitaliy@kievinfo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sick_soul@yahoo.it
--- Comment #35 from Vitaliy Margolen vitaliy@kievinfo.com 2009-11-07 16:12:12 --- *** Bug 20605 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
default_357-line@yahoo.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |default_357-line@yahoo.de
--- Comment #36 from default_357-line@yahoo.de 2009-11-17 06:10:05 --- err:winebrowser:get_url_from_dde Unable to retrieve URL from string L"""
Occurs when trying to open the Redeem Code option in Dragon Age: Origins. I'm presuming this is if not the same bug, then at least directly related. (Please remove if wrong)
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Marcus Kempe kempe.marcus@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kempe.marcus@gmail.com
--- Comment #37 from Marcus Kempe kempe.marcus@gmail.com 2009-11-19 18:27:18 --- It would also seem that bug #18465 is related to this bug, It gives the exact same output:
x@y:~$ wine rundll32 url.dll,FileProtocolHandler http://www.winehq.org/ err:winebrowser:get_url_from_dde Unable to retrieve URL from string L""" err:winebrowser:wmain Usage: winebrowser URL
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
--- Comment #38 from André H. nerv@dawncrow.de 2009-11-20 09:36:13 --- (In reply to comment #37)
It would also seem that bug #18465 is related to this bug, It gives the exact same output:
x@y:~$ wine rundll32 url.dll,FileProtocolHandler http://www.winehq.org/ err:winebrowser:get_url_from_dde Unable to retrieve URL from string L""" err:winebrowser:wmain Usage: winebrowser URL
I cant see that in the bugreport and cant reproduce it. if i try that i get no errors and no fixmes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
--- Comment #39 from Marcus Kempe kempe.marcus@gmail.com 2009-11-20 10:56:17 --- Created an attachment (id=24863) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=24863) Error output from program run.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
--- Comment #40 from André H. nerv@dawncrow.de 2009-11-20 10:58:41 --- (In reply to comment #39)
Created an attachment (id=24863)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=24863) [details]
Error output from program run.
did you tried that in a clean wineprefix?
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
--- Comment #41 from Marcus Kempe kempe.marcus@gmail.com 2009-11-20 12:19:53 --- (In reply to comment #40)
did you tried that in a clean wineprefix?
No, my bad, I didn't. I forgot I had the Windows DLLs lying around. In a clean wineprefix, I get no output at all.
I guess that means that #18465 is not a duplicate, rather dependent on this one?
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@codeweavers.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |zilforever@gmail.com
--- Comment #42 from Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@codeweavers.com 2009-12-08 02:40:39 --- *** Bug 20403 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |support@securenetterm.com
--- Comment #43 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com 2010-02-05 16:29:13 --- *** Bug 21601 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lubosz@gmail.com
--- Comment #44 from Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org 2010-02-18 07:24:19 --- *** Bug 21757 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Ken Sharp kennybobs@o2.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |simon@simonbcn.net
--- Comment #45 from Ken Sharp kennybobs@o2.co.uk 2010-02-18 07:43:03 --- *** Bug 19970 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Ken Sharp kennybobs@o2.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |17271
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Denis Rut'kov dendron2000@mail.ru changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|dendron2000@mail.ru |
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Wylda wylda@volny.cz changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wylda@volny.cz
--- Comment #46 from Wylda wylda@volny.cz 2010-02-27 14:18:44 ---
Still not fixed in wine-1.1.39-163-g583f0f0. Tested on 3dmark 2001.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Ken Sharp kennybobs@o2.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |newsletter@Schiermeier-Soft | |ware.de
--- Comment #47 from Ken Sharp kennybobs@o2.co.uk 2010-03-04 20:05:39 --- *** Bug 15585 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Mike Ellery mellery@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mellery@gmail.com
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ian.mcdonald@jandi.co.uk
--- Comment #48 from Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org 2010-03-21 17:21:38 --- *** Bug 22106 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Jaromir Obr jaromir.obr@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jaromir.obr@gmail.com
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Luke Bratch l_bratch@yahoo.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |l_bratch@yahoo.co.uk
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
--- Comment #49 from Vincent Povirk madewokherd@gmail.com 2010-05-13 12:25:58 --- I believe we have two problems here:
1. winebrowser uses DdeInitializeW and then expects to get ansi data. This is backwards.
2. WDML_BuildExecuteCommand decides whether the server is unicode (and thus whether to do a conversion) by looking at the server's window AND the client's window. So if a client is ansi and a server is unicode, we never convert the data.
Changing the DdeInitializeW call in winebrowser to DdeInitializeA actually gives the correct result in both win98 and winxp mode, since we always get ansi data as winebrowser (now correctly) expects.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
--- Comment #50 from Hans Leidekker hans@meelstraat.net 2010-05-13 13:14:25 --- DdeInitialize determines the default codepage but the app can override it via the iCodePage field of the CONVCONTEXT structure. Changing the call to DdeInitializeA breaks other apps, see bug 13740 for example.
We need a way to retrieve the codepage from the conversation handle. That and a patch like the one from comment #1 would fix this bug I believe.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Simón simon@simonbcn.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|simon@simonbcn.net |
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
--- Comment #51 from Vincent Povirk madewokherd@gmail.com 2010-05-13 13:49:30 --- I don't think your patch is correct. winebrowser should never have to do a string conversion.
We have tests that show that in the client=ascii, server=unicode case the data passed to DdeClientTransaction is converted from ascii to unicode if it is not a unicode string. These tests are currently marked todo.
However, if they were fixed, winebrowser would do an additional conversion in this case, which would break it, even with your patch.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
--- Comment #52 from Vincent Povirk madewokherd@gmail.com 2010-05-13 14:05:16 --- In fact, bug 13740 appears to be a case where changing from DdeInitializeA to DdeInitializeW CAUSED a regression, which was "fixed" by assuming winebrowser would get ANSI data through dde. Which it should never get in reality because dde should be converting the string to unicode as the tests show.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
--- Comment #53 from Vincent Povirk madewokherd@gmail.com 2010-05-13 14:50:28 --- Created an attachment (id=27939) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=27939) user32: Change the conversion logic in WDML_BuildExecuteCommand (fixes some tests but breaks others)
This patch fixes string conversion in the cases where both the client and server are using dddml. However, it breaks it in the case where only the client uses ddeml and the server uses window messages directly.
The MSDN documentation for WM_DDE_EXECUTE explains why we test whether both the client and server window are unicode, since this determines whether the server expects a unicode string.
This suggests to me that ddeml on the server side needs to determine the appropriate type of encoding for the data when it gets a WM_DDE_EXECUTE message and convert it to what the server expects, rather than on the client side as my patch does.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
--- Comment #54 from Vincent Povirk madewokherd@gmail.com 2010-05-13 16:33:25 --- I've sent some patches: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2010-May/088370.html
The tests and WM_DDE_EXECUTE documentation lead me to believe that ddeml expects UNICODE data if both client and server are unicode and ANSI-OR-MAYBE-UNICODE data otherwise, and that it converts that on the server side based on whether DdeInitializeA or DdeInitializeW is called.
If any cases are still broken because of the odd usage of a CONVCONTEXT structure, they should be fixed on the client side where that structure is accessible. I have no reason to believe that structure has any meaning in the low level dde protocol, and therefore I don't believe it's possible for the server to retrieve the structure as the client has it.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Octavian Voicu octavian.voicu@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |octavian.voicu@gmail.com
--- Comment #55 from Octavian Voicu octavian.voicu@gmail.com 2010-05-13 16:45:58 --- Hans Leidekker sent the patch with a note:
winebrowser: Don't convert URL if DDE conversation partner uses CP_WINUNICODE. This patch might fix it if we'd support querying remote conversation
information in our DDE implementation.
It seems pretty clear to me, the only real fix for the problem (which doesn't involve lucky guesses/heuristics) is to query the conversation partner about what it uses.
This is related to the FIXME [1] from DdeQueryConvInfo: FIXME("Request on remote conversation information is not implemented yet\n");
I'm pretty sure Windows API supports this.
Octavian
[1] http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/?a=blob;f=dlls/user32/dde_misc.c;h=ac4...
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
--- Comment #56 from Vincent Povirk madewokherd@gmail.com 2010-05-13 16:48:36 --- What if the client does not use ddeml, and therefore it does not understand such a thing as a CONVINFO structure? winebrowser needs to still function in that case.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
--- Comment #57 from Hans Leidekker hans@meelstraat.net 2010-05-14 03:24:26 --- I agree with Octavian, we don't want to rely on heuristics. Alexandre has rejected proposals based on IsTextUnicode before.
I found this bit on MSDN: (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms997515.aspx)
Working with Unicode in Windows NT
Applications that register a DDE window class that is Unicode must use Unicode execute strings when communicating with other Unicode DDE windows. They must use ASCII (OEM codepage) execute strings when communicating with non-Unicode DDE windows. Any window's state can be determined by calling IsWindowUnicode. This convention places the burden of backward compatibility on Unicode DDE applications.
Unicode compatibility is only a problem for raw DDE applications because DDEML automatically translates execute strings. DDEML bases its translation decision on how DDEML was called—either by DdeInitiateA or DdeInitiateW—when the application first initialized the conversation.
I guess we should find out how Internet Explorer behaves when you use raw DDE.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Paul Chitescu paulc@voip.null.ro changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paulc@voip.null.ro
--- Comment #58 from Paul Chitescu paulc@voip.null.ro 2010-05-14 06:02:24 --- (In reply to comment #57)
I agree with Octavian, we don't want to rely on heuristics. Alexandre has rejected proposals based on IsTextUnicode before.
[...] I guess we should find out how Internet Explorer behaves when you use raw DDE.
Wine has the unusual challenge that it supports to report different versions for the applications involved in a DDE transaction.
In Windows there is no ambiguity as it transports ATOMs in a fixed way over DDE: - ANSI versions use the ANSI charset as raw data - Unicode versions use UCS-2 (pre-Win2K) or UTF-16
Since the format is linked to the way Windows is compiled, on a given system there can be only one format. It doesn't depend how DDE is initialized or if the windows is Unicode or not, that conversion is handled locally.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
--- Comment #59 from Vincent Povirk madewokherd@gmail.com 2010-05-14 07:06:38 --- We have tests where the very same conversation (same client, same server) sends ansi and unicode data through ddeml and it comes out in the same format on the other end. How do you propose to fix those tests without using IsTextUnicode or a similar heuristic?
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
--- Comment #60 from Hans Leidekker hans@meelstraat.net 2010-05-14 08:24:30 --- We could try pass a false negative like U+0d0a (MALAYALAM LETTER UU) to WM_DDE_EXECUTE. That might provide a hint whether native uses IsTextUnicode.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Danila Sentiabov dsent.zen@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dsent.zen@gmail.com
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Carlton Hobbs carlton.hobbs@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |carlton.hobbs@gmail.com
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
--- Comment #61 from André H. nerv@dawncrow.de 2010-06-07 14:59:10 --- any updates on this?
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
--- Comment #62 from Vincent Povirk madewokherd@gmail.com 2010-06-07 15:08:49 --- I sent some patches and was told they needed tests. I have not written them yet.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
--- Comment #63 from Wylda wylda@volny.cz 2010-06-19 06:46:36 ---
Still present in wine-1.2-rc4. Tested on 3Dmark 2006.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Vitaliy Margolen vitaliy@kievinfo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |buggy_wine_bugzilla@elektro | |maniak.wz.cz
--- Comment #64 from Vitaliy Margolen vitaliy@kievinfo.com 2010-06-19 14:04:02 --- *** Bug 23260 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Johan Dahlin jdahlin@async.com.br changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|jdahlin@async.com.br |
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Lucas canolucas@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |canolucas@gmail.com
--- Comment #65 from Lucas canolucas@gmail.com 2010-06-21 16:53:34 --- Povirk, i would like to take a look at your patches please. which are them?
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
--- Comment #66 from Vincent Povirk madewokherd@gmail.com 2010-06-21 16:56:38 --- http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2010-May/088370.html and the two following messages.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Ruslan b7.10110111@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|10110111@mail.ru |
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #67 from Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org 2010-06-25 09:46:24 --- Fixed by b2de316fc59875a810cbe60e94e05e6c96836e95.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--- Comment #68 from Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org 2010-06-25 12:40:39 --- Closing bugs fixed in 1.2-rc5.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Juan Lang juan_lang@yahoo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |turbolad995@hotmail.co.uk
--- Comment #69 from Juan Lang juan_lang@yahoo.com 2011-04-07 17:10:22 CDT --- *** Bug 22549 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
André H. nerv@dawncrow.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed by SHA1| |b2de316fc59875a810cbe60e94e | |05e6c96836e95
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Sylvain Petreolle spetreolle@yahoo.fr changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|spetreolle@yahoo.fr |
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Anastasius Focht focht@gmx.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |focht@gmx.net URL|http://download.bittorrent. |https://web.archive.org/web |com/dl/BitTorrent-6.2b.exe |/20120419030502/http://down | |load.bittorrent.com//dl/Bit | |Torrent-6.0.2.exe Hardware|Other |x86 OS|other |Linux
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org -
WineHQ Bugzilla