[Bug 2332] 16-bit application fails due to regression in NE-module handling

[Wine Bugs]

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2332

------- Additional Comments From [e-mail]  2004-16-07 07:45 -------
Created an attachment (id=628)
 --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=628&action=view)
difference between two outputs introduced by the patch [1].

sorry for an ugly diff.  now the differences are more clear as i've synched
(unified handle numbers), cleaned and compared outputs with some script:

#!/bin/bash
RPRFX=.simplified
SRCS=led2w.*patch
for SRC in $SRCS; do (	\
  cat $SRC |		\
  awk '{					     \
    gsub(					     \
      "4083[0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f]",	     \
      "4083xxxx");				     \
    gsub(					     \
      "405[0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f]", \
      "405yyyyy");				     \
    gsub("0x70", "0x6c");			     \
    gsub(					     \
      "4161[0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f]",	     \
      "4161zzzz");				     \
    gsub("0x7c", "0x74");			     \
    gsub("0x90", "0x88");			     \
    gsub("0x68", "0x64");			     \
    gsub("0x94", "0x8c");			     \
    skip2=skip; 				     \
    skip=index( 				     \
      $0,					     \
      "GENERIC_READ FILE_SHARE_READ OPEN_EXISTING"); \
    if((skip==0) && (skip2==0)) print		     \
  }'			\
> $SRC$RPRFX		\

); done
diff -u 					     \
  led2w.before_the_patch.simplified		     \
  led2w.after_the_patch.simplifiedsec