http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34454
Bug #: 34454 Summary: Do not use builtin TTF fonts when native appropriate fonts are present in the system Product: Wine Version: 1.7.1 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: fonts AssignedTo: wine-bugs@winehq.org ReportedBy: t.artem@mailcity.com Classification: Unclassified
This is a continuation of bug 34446.
I'd like to propose that Wine should never try to load or use builtin fonts (which don't exactly look nice under certain fontconfig settings, like full hinting) when native appropriate fonts are present in the system.
Thanks.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34454
Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@baikal.ru changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Component|fonts |-unknown Resolution| |INVALID
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@baikal.ru 2013-09-05 03:07:32 CDT --- It's already implemented. Built-in fonts have lower font version than native ones, so if native font exists it gets used instead of a built-in one.
Problem in the bug 34446 is completely unrelated. Moreover, Tahoma has never been a part of the original Microsoft web fonts pack, so in order to use it one needs a Windows license.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34454
--- Comment #2 from Artem S. Tashkinov t.artem@mailcity.com 2013-09-05 03:12:29 CDT --- (In reply to comment #1)
It's already implemented. Built-in fonts have lower font version than native ones, so if native font exists it gets used instead of a built-in one.
Problem in the bug 34446 is completely unrelated. Moreover, Tahoma has never been a part of the original Microsoft web fonts pack, so in order to use it one needs a Windows license.
I have a Windows license and I own this font legally. You sound like people who have this font installed should experience a bad font rendering only because others don't have a Microsoft version.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34454
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--- Comment #3 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com 2013-09-11 12:41:08 CDT --- Closing.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34454
Artem S. Tashkinov t.artem@mailcity.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID |
--- Comment #4 from Artem S. Tashkinov t.artem@mailcity.com 2013-09-11 13:55:17 CDT --- (In reply to comment #3)
Closing.
Sorry, why is this bug being closed? It hasn't been solved at all.
And it's perfectly valid.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34454
--- Comment #5 from Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@baikal.ru 2013-09-11 21:33:53 CDT --- (In reply to comment #4)
Sorry, why is this bug being closed? It hasn't been solved at all.
The answer is in Comment 1: it's already implemented.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34454
--- Comment #6 from Artem S. Tashkinov t.artem@mailcity.com 2013-09-11 23:18:48 CDT --- (In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment #4)
Sorry, why is this bug being closed? It hasn't been solved at all.
The answer is in Comment 1: it's already implemented.
The way I see this issue - Wine's implementation is _wildly_ incorrect.
My Tahoma fonts (I have two of them) have a lot more glyphs than Wine's Tahoma, they have two slopes, they have two weights - and you're saying that choosing an incomplete builtin font over a system installed font which has a lot more features is right?
I will CC Alexandre Julliard.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34454
--- Comment #7 from Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@baikal.ru 2013-09-12 00:32:23 CDT --- (In reply to comment #6)
Sorry, why is this bug being closed? It hasn't been solved at all.
The answer is in Comment 1: it's already implemented.
The way I see this issue - Wine's implementation is _wildly_ incorrect.
I already explained why built-in Tahoma gets selected instead of a native one for Russian locale, and that's the subject of the bug 34446.
My Tahoma fonts (I have two of them) have a lot more glyphs than Wine's Tahoma, they have two slopes, they have two weights - and you're saying that choosing an incomplete builtin font over a system installed font which has a lot more features is right?
I've never said that.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34454
--- Comment #8 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com --- This is your friendly reminder that there has been no bug activity for over a year. Is this still an issue in current (1.7.37 or newer) wine? If so, please attach the terminal output in 1.7.37 (see http://wiki.winehq.org/FAQ#get_log).
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34454
Jens Reyer jre.winesim@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jre.winesim@gmail.com