July 2023 - wine-gitlab

[PATCH 0/2] MR280: vkd3d-shader: sm1 semantic matching.
by Zebediah Figura (＠zfigura) 21 Jul '23

21 Jul '23

This is probably the most ugly and controversial bit of API. I don't really know if this is the right approach to solving this. sm4 registers match by register index, such that shaders can mostly be compiled in isolation. sm1 does not—registers may be specified in any order in the vertex and pixel shaders, and will be matched by usage and usage index. By itself this is not much of a problem. Where it gets hairy is that we want to do some degree of caching, as well as pre-compilation, and avoid recompiling either shader every time it's matched with a new one. Wine currently deals with this problem, for GLSL, by generating a "main" GLSL shader for the vertex shader, and then an extra function setup_vs_output(), and linking the two together every time a new pixel shader is used. This could in theory be used for SPIR-V, but it requires the use of extra, probably external, code to link SPIR-V shaders together, which I do not particularly anticipate being well-received. (I'm not sure how Wine deals with this problem in the ARB backend. It seems to take the pixel shader signature into account when generating the vertex shader— cf. init_output_registers()—but it doesn't take it into account when looking up a vertex shader variant? I didn't look too closely at the code, so maybe I'm missing something.) -- The vkd3d parts of this patch are quite straightforward, and looking at them, I think the design is quite intuitive in isolation. There may be some room for internal refactoring (in particular with an eye to not so much overloading the "register_index" field of struct shader_signature_element) but I'm relatively happy with the way it turned out. In isolation, that is. The Wine part is worse. I've uploaded branches for vkd3d and Wine that use this API, and correctly handle shaders with some nontrivial reordering: https://gitlab.winehq.org/zfigura/vkd3d/-/commits/himavant5 https://gitlab.winehq.org/zfigura/wine/-/commits/himavant_cb The test can be run, as before, like so: make tests/shader_runner.exe && WINE_D3D_CONFIG=renderer=vulkan wine tests/shader_runner.exe ../vkd3d/tests/hlsl/sm1-interstage-interface.shader_test The interesting Wine parts are concentrated in a single patch, 5cfb9d930f11e. The patch takes a few shortcuts, partly because I wanted not to block the vkd3d API design questions, but also because while writing it I came up with a couple of problems that I wasn't sure how to fix. There are two main problems I see: (1) This patch has the user pass the signature from the pixel shader when compiling the vertex shader, and looks up register indices already arbitrarily allocated by the pixel shader. This is problematic when trying to use this signature as a cache key, by virtue of it not being clear (or even defined) which fields are key elements and which aren't. It's also not particularly kind to lookup, on account of not being directly comparable with memcmp(). There are a few options I see: (a) Provide an internal function to compare key elements. This feels... odd, like a very special-purpose function, but perhaps workable. (b) Just make the user deal with it, and assert that all fields are key elements. (c) Use some alternative, perhaps shortened structure as a field of vkd3d_shader_next_stage_info. This has the disadvantage that it is not as simple for a hypothetical user to retrieve from the pixel shader, but we would presumably provide a function to generate one from a shader signature. This would probably also be kinder to cache lookup if it's shorter. (d) Make caching vkd3d's responsibility, to some degree. This seems daunting, but the more we optimize, the more difficult it may be to design API that allows for nice caching. (2) Assuming we use signatures, there is a memory management problem that 5cfb9d930f11e spells out. This is probably a matter of "just fix it", but I suppose another option is to take the GLSL or ARB architecture. -- April is the cruellest month, breeding Lilacs out of the dead land, mixing Memory and desire, stirring Dull roots with spring rain. -- https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/vkd3d/-/merge_requests/280

3 8

[PATCH v4 0/4] MR260: vkd3d: Prepare for buffering of command list commands.
by Conor McCarthy (＠cmccarthy) 21 Jul '23

21 Jul '23

-- v4: vkd3d: Add a pending execution count to struct d3d12_command_signature. tests: Test releasing the command signature immediately after use. https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/vkd3d/-/merge_requests/260

2 4

Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] MR278: vkd3d-shader/dxil: Emit the shader instructions.
by Conor McCarthy (＠cmccarthy) 21 Jul '23

21 Jul '23

On Fri Jul 21 01:25:37 2023 +0000, Henri Verbeet wrote: > > For the d3d12 and shader runner tests I've been using an environment > variable to specify the path to DXC, HLSL source declarations in > d3d12.c, and an `[enable]` directive in shader runner. Are those > acceptable for upstream? > It's of course not ideal to depend on DXC/dxcompiler for the DXIL shader > runner tests like that, but I think we can work with that, yes. There's > some precedent as well, because we can also use d3dcompiler for running > shader runner tests. > In terms of the checksum, the most practical way to make that work in > the shader runner is probably to introduce a flag like > "VKD3D_SHADER_PARSE_DXBC_IGNORE_CHECKSUM" for vkd3d_shader_parse_dxbc(), > then use that to parse the DXBCs produced by Linux DXC, and use > vkd3d_shader_serialize_dxbc() to create a DXBC blob to pass to > d3d12/vkd3d. Also, would we need to use DXC, or could we use the > dxcompiler library? Using dxcompiler would be preferable, but instead of COM interfaces it uses C++ linking, and when I tried using it a while ago I couldn't get the calling conventions to match up, even if the C declaration was explicitly declared the same convention as the dxcompiler function. It worked if I added a wrapper in a C++ source file, but we probably don't want that. I'll take another look and see if they can be made to match up. -- https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/vkd3d/-/merge_requests/278#note_39702

1 0

[PATCH 0/1] MR3364: po: Update Lithuanian translation.
by Aurimas Fišeras (＠AurimasF) 20 Jul '23

20 Jul '23

-- https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/3364

3 2

Re: [PATCH v6 0/9] MR3300: jscript: WeakMap implementation. - approved
by Alexandre Julliard (＠julliard) 20 Jul '23

20 Jul '23

This merge request was approved by Alexandre Julliard. -- https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/3300

1 0

Re: [PATCH v5 0/1] MR3358: msvcrt: fix out-of-bound access in create_locinfo - approved
by Alexandre Julliard (＠julliard) 20 Jul '23

20 Jul '23

This merge request was approved by Alexandre Julliard. -- https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/3358

1 0

Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] MR3305: Remove DECLSPEC_HIDDEN DirectX - approved
by Alexandre Julliard (＠julliard) 20 Jul '23

20 Jul '23

This merge request was approved by Alexandre Julliard. -- https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/3305

1 0

Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] MR3339: server: Cancel asyncs when the last handle in process is closed. - approved
by Alexandre Julliard (＠julliard) 20 Jul '23

20 Jul '23

This merge request was approved by Alexandre Julliard. -- https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/3339

1 0

Re: [PATCH v6 0/7] MR3328: sapi: Partially implement ISpVoice::Speak. - approved
by Alexandre Julliard (＠julliard) 20 Jul '23

20 Jul '23

This merge request was approved by Alexandre Julliard. -- https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/3328

1 0

Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] MR3260: mmdevapi: Implement get_audio_session. - approved
by Alexandre Julliard (＠julliard) 20 Jul '23

20 Jul '23

This merge request was approved by Alexandre Julliard. -- https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/3260

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

wine-gitlab July 2023