On Thu Oct 5 17:32:10 2023 +0000, Aidan Khoury wrote:
> 1. Yes, however not easily. With my sample PE (which is what I used to
> make the "normalized" buffers), it was not complex enough to emit patch
> transformations when I used the mspatchc API. I tried for about a dozen
> hours before giving in and using an existing real world buffer, which I
> extracted from the adobe installers.
> 2. Possible, yet extremely complicated as patch transformations appear
> pretty complex.
> The source of the buffers is the adobe acrobat x86_64 installer.
Does that mean that the test data is copyrighted?
--
https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/3870#note_47745
On Tue Oct 3 16:18:47 2023 +0000, Zebediah Figura wrote:
> > Oh! Okay, I will use `RtlImageNtHeader` and then do the bounds checks
> afterwards :)
> I suppose it's a matter of taste, but personally I don't find this an improvement...
So, should I make the effort or no?
--
https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/3870#note_47741