On Mon May 5 06:50:10 2025 +0000, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Many thanks for noticing this. Should be fixed in v2.
I'm not sure actually. Testbot and GitLab CI disagrees on what tests should fail.
This is how GitLab CI fails now:
``` msg.c:17356:32.309 Test failed: LB_SETCOUNT: 4: the msg 0x0014 was expected, but got msg 0x0085 instead msg.c:17356:32.309 Test failed: LB_SETCOUNT: 5: the msg 0x0047 was expected, but got msg 0x0085 instead msg.c:17356:32.309 Test failed: LB_SETCOUNT: 6: the msg 0x0005 was expected, but got msg 0x0085 instead msg.c:17356:32.309 Test failed: LB_SETCOUNT: 7: the winevent_hook 0x800e was expected, but got msg 0x0085 instead msg.c:17356:32.309 Test failed: LB_SETCOUNT: 8: the winevent_hook 0x800b was expected, but got msg 0x0085 instead msg.c:17356:32.310 Test failed: LB_SETCOUNT: 10: the msg 0x0400 was expected, but got msg 0x0085 instead msg.c:17356:32.310 Test failed: LB_SETCOUNT: 11: in msg 0x0085 expecting wParam 0x1 got 0x5040082 msg.c:17356:32.310 Test failed: LB_SETCOUNT: 11: the msg 0x0085 was expected in child msg.c:17356:32.310 Test failed: LB_SETCOUNT: 12: the msg 0x0014 was expected in child msg.c:17356:32.310 Test failed: LB_SETCOUNT: 13: the msg 0x0134 was expected, but got msg 0x0047 instead msg.c:17356:32.310 Test failed: LB_SETCOUNT: 13: the msg 0x0134 was expected, but got msg 0x0005 instead msg.c:17356:32.311 Test failed: LB_SETCOUNT: 13: the msg 0x0134 was expected, but got winevent_hook 0x800e instead msg.c:17356:32.311 Test failed: LB_SETCOUNT: 13: the msg 0x0134 was expected, but got winevent_hook 0x800b instead msg.c:17356:32.311 Test failed: LB_SETCOUNT: 13: the msg 0x0134 was expected, but got msg 0x0400 instead msg.c:17356:32.311 Test failed: LB_SETCOUNT: 13: the msg 0x0134 was expected, but got msg 0x0085 instead msg.c:17356:32.311 Test failed: LB_SETCOUNT: 13: the msg 0x0134 was expected, but got msg 0x0014 instead msg.c:8186:32.361 Test marked todo: WM_SETFOCUS on a ComboBox: 3: the msg 0x0111 was expected, but got ms ```
meanwhile testbot succeeds: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=158168
so maybe the test is a bit too strict and some messages in the sequence should be left omitted or something.