Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] MR7857: winewayland: Don't update constraints without wl_pointer.

[Attila Fidan (＠atticf)]

On Sat Apr 26 05:16:37 2025 +0000, Alexandros Frantzis wrote:
> Another alternative would be to encode the wl_pointer requirement in
> `needs_lock` and `needs_confine` in `wayland_pointer_update_constraint`.
> This has the extra benefit that it moves us towards better handling of
> dynamic removals, since we will then destroy any inert zwp constraint
> proxies without any special code paths (we are not completely there yet,
> since we don't guarantee reapplication of the cursor clip on wl_pointer
> removal, but it's a step in the right direction). Does such a change
> work for your use case?

Sure, I moved it there.