On Thu Aug 21 16:06:57 2025 +0000, Paul Gofman wrote:
The existing code de-facto falls back to server call always if there was an error accessing shared memory. I thought if that can happen this should fallback to server call and not to try to rely on any serial checks as `retval` is wrong already. Relying on serial comparison is possible (if changing default value) but seems not straightforward. Is it not the case?
I don't think we need to worry about shared memory access errors, it's unlikely to happen and if it does then something is going very wrong anyway.