Re: [PATCH 0/6] MR102: hlsl: Matrix majority, 2023 edition, part 2/2.

[Zebediah Figura (＠zfigura)]

On Wed Feb 22 14:31:58 2023 +0000, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> This test can be made a tad stronger by moving `#pragma
> pack_matrix(column_major)` up one line.

Eh, that wasn't quite the intent of the test when I wrote it—the intent was to show that typedef applies the latent majority modifiers. The problem is, other tests show that struct fields already have latent majority modifiers applied, so this test isn't really proving anything (and I don't think changing it that way proves anything new either). I'll rework this a bit.