Jinoh Kang (@iamahuman) commented about dlls/ntdll/tests/exception.c:
0x0f, 0x28, 0xf0, /* movaps %xmm0, %xmm6 */
0x0f, 0x28, 0xf8, /* movaps %xmm0, %xmm7 */
0x44, 0x0f, 0x28, 0xc0, /* movaps %xmm0, %xmm8 */
0x44, 0x0f, 0x28, 0xc8, /* movaps %xmm0, %xmm9 */
0x44, 0x0f, 0x28, 0xd0, /* movaps %xmm0, %xmm10 */
0x44, 0x0f, 0x28, 0xd8, /* movaps %xmm0, %xmm11 */
0x44, 0x0f, 0x28, 0xe0, /* movaps %xmm0, %xmm12 */
0x44, 0x0f, 0x28, 0xe8, /* movaps %xmm0, %xmm13 */
0x44, 0x0f, 0x28, 0xf0, /* movaps %xmm0, %xmm14 */
0x44, 0x0f, 0x28, 0xf8, /* movaps %xmm0, %xmm15 */
/* FIXME: overwrite debug, x87 FPU and AVX registers to test those */
/* load args */
0x48, 0x8b, 0x4c, 0x24, 0x50, /* mov 8*10(%rsp), %rcx; context */
0x48, 0x8b, 0x54, 0x24, 0x58, /* mov 8*11(%rsp), %rdx; alertable */
Ditto.
```suggestion:-1+0 0x48, 0x8b, 0x4c, 0x24, 0x70, /* mov 8*14(%rsp), %rcx; context */ 0x48, 0x8b, 0x54, 0x24, 0x78, /* mov 8*15(%rsp), %rdx; alertable */ ```