Re: [PATCH 0/4] MR6733: Mfplat HTTP byte stream implementation

[Torge Matthies (＠tmatthies)]

On Fri Oct 25 13:31:46 2024 +0000, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
> This suggest that wininet is involved then? Also, why only check for
> mms: or for any scheme at all? I think it should be registered in scheme
> handler section, so if we don't need one for mms, maybe it should not
> call http one?

mms:// is only "not supported" when there's an error connecting to the server, otherwise it functions like HTTP. Well, it's supposed to try a different protocol first, but I found no existing implementation of said protocol in Wine, and I was focusing on HTTP/HTTPS here. I suppose I should just mark this protocol as entirely unsupported for now instead of relying on the HTTP fallback.