On Tue Feb 28 14:37:01 2023 +0000, Henri Verbeet wrote:
It's probably worth pointing out that this has quite some potential for causing regressions in performance. swapchain_blit_gdi() is not fast, and ideally we'd work on reducing the number of cases where it's needed.
!2217 should avoid most of those cases I think, it probably makes sense to wait for that one to go in first.