On Tue Jul 9 06:42:04 2024 +0000, Huw Davies wrote:
Looks fine.
Actually, no it doesn't. The first call returns the length, you'd presumably need to replace the second call further down (perhaps even more reason to cache the mib).
Whoa, whoops. Thanks, missed that when I was cleaning up the patch. I'm now caching the mib, which cleans things up a bit as well.