Re: [PATCH 0/2] MR4883: ntoskrnl: Use internal name for asm exports.

[Gabriel Ivăncescu (＠insn)]

On Mon Jan 22 15:35:13 2024 +0000, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Unfortunately naked functions don't have well-defined semantics, I don't
> think we can use them.

They seem to be well defined nowadays, on the x86 page:

https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/x86-Function-Attributes.html

They're there since [GCC 8
apparently](https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-8.1.0/gcc/x86-Function-Attributes.html),
but I'm not sure if they were reliable back then or not. We can use a
version check to guard them in such case?

And of course we already use basic asm so that shouldn't be an issue right?