On Mon Oct 10 00:17:01 2022 +0000, **** wrote:
Zebediah Figura replied on the mailing list:
On 10/5/22 03:11, Anton Baskanov wrote: > From: Anton Baskanov <baskanov@gmail.com> > > Signed-off-by: Anton Baskanov <baskanov@gmail.com> > --- > configure | 2 ++ > configure.ac | 1 + > dlls/l3codecx.ax/Makefile.in | 4 ++++ > dlls/l3codecx.ax/l3codecx.ax.spec | 5 +++++ > dlls/l3codecx.ax/main.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 5 files changed, 48 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 dlls/l3codecx.ax/Makefile.in > create mode 100644 dlls/l3codecx.ax/l3codecx.ax.spec > create mode 100644 dlls/l3codecx.ax/main.c Judging from your "l3codecx" branch (and from what I'd expect), we're not actually going to vend this from l3codecx.ax, right? I don't remember if it's possible with our build system to have a test module without a corresponding DLL, but if not, I'd be tempted just to put these tests in quartz instead. Not a big deal, though.
Removed the DLL in v2.