30 Aug
2022
30 Aug
'22
9:36 a.m.
On Tue Aug 30 09:06:06 2022 +0000, Huw Davies wrote:
This whole loop doesn't look right. @jacek do happen to know how this is supposed to work?
Yeah, it seems that pulse_cond_wait return value handling is reversed. I think that 6f632affa75a meant to handle it similarly to equivalent pulse_test_connect.