Re: [PATCH v8 0/4] MR8595: comctl32: Separate v5 and v6.

[Nikolay Sivov (＠nsivov)]

On Mon Jul 28 14:43:44 2025 +0000, Zhiyi Zhang wrote:
> Hi Nikolay, I'd like to take this further. Is the loader change the only
> thing blocking this MR? Extending the builtin signature check works, but
> I am not sure it will be accepted upstream. Another way is to add a
> resource like OriginalFilename. But parsing resources in the unix loader
> will be a pain as well. @julliard, do you think there are better
> solutions? do you think the loader changes in the MR is acceptable?

Yes, loader changes is my biggest concern.