Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] MR4551: Server-side thread priorities implementation (Part 1)

[Rémi Bernon (＠rbernon)]

On Fri Dec  1 18:37:13 2023 +0000, Rémi Bernon wrote:
> Hmm actually no, but still it makes me wonder if there's actually a
> point in passing the process nice limit. I'm not completely sure how
> setpriority works but if it only uses the caller limits and if
> wineserver is more limited than the process itself it won't succeed anyway.

I think you can also drop 896e234327a843665c4360252c36221bbcc92685, I don't see how it is useful.