Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] MR602: vkd3d-shader/dxil: Inverse trigonometry

[Conor McCarthy (＠cmccarthy)]

On Tue Feb  6 09:52:52 2024 +0000, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> Why do you use two different approaches for sine (just setting the ULP
> tolerance) and cosine (quantizing and handling differently SM1-5 and
> SM6)? Not that I have a big problem with it, mostly curious.

I'm not sure why the variation is so large for `asin()`in particular, but that's the reason.