On Thu Oct 26 20:38:16 2023 +0000, Jeffrey Smith wrote:
It's not obvious to me why this is 0.25f. Could you explain?
Based on my obervations, it gives better accuracy closer to native. Now I am thinking, I should replace this magic number with FlatnessDefault variable instead. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/gdipluspath/nf-gdipluspa...
I will do that in separate MR as default flatness needs to be changed also in other places.