Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] MR4611: ntdll: implement NtGetNextProcess

[Nikolay Sivov (＠nsivov)]

On Wed Dec  6 20:00:30 2023 +0000, Etaash Mathamsetty wrote:
> the original patch and the thread version also uses 0 here, so I will
> stick with that for now until I wrote more tests.

Right, access mask you pass in is for returned handle. To access current point of iteration it's probably enough to use PROCESS_QUERY_LIMITED_INFORMATION. If it works without this access, we might use 0 I suppose.