On Sun Jan 22 23:00:47 2023 +0000, Thomas Csovcsity wrote:
I will do in future commits, when function grows, atm it will only introduce additional buffers and more parameters in function to pass back strings and length value or pointer positions ...
I don't see a reason not to do it now. I don't think the current code is very readable.
I don't think the function needs to be very complex, either. I originally proposed that the helper would fix up the scheme, but as far as I can tell, it can just return a guessed scheme, and leave the fixup to UrlFixupW() itself.