Re: [PATCH 0/7] MR8900: Comment or define undefined WinRT member interfaces (2/2)

[Elizabeth Figura (＠zfigura)]

On Fri Sep  5 08:33:30 2025 +0000, Hans Leidekker wrote:
> That's the convention MS uses for these size_is parameters. They are
> implicit and must always precede conformant array parameters.
> https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/uwp/winrt-cref/winrt-type-system,
> section on array parameters says: "The array size parameter does not
> have a name". C doesn't allow that, so I think the underscores are used
> to avoid potential name conflicts. 
> Also note that winmd skips these size_is parameters and encodes arrays
> as NULL terminated arrays.

Do we need to match Microsoft's parameter names? Are they encoded in whatever winrt's equivalent of a typelib is?