25 Mar
2024
25 Mar
'24
9:53 a.m.
On Mon Mar 25 09:48:27 2024 +0000, Rémi Bernon wrote:
changed this line in [version 28 of the diff](/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/3103/diffs?diff_id=107028&start_sha=8cb018bc8efed182ec6578067a4f196e7d6a4704#f4827eaac5000d9e0cb10ecd13fa0e88138746ac_387_380)
Changed this to use single loops. I didn't include the comment because I don't find it very clear: the "corrupted value" part looks confusing to me, the issue isn't partial reads or something like that but simply that the loop might iterate several times, and it needs to be taken into account in its body. I think that with an explicit loop it should be enough, like for any other loop.