Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] MR2905: sapi: implement more token functionality.

[Huw Davies (＠huw)]

> Since the current implementation uses the key in token_enum I would have to re-stub the current implementation in order to split the second commit. Would this be a good idea?

No, that would cause a regression.

Couldn't you add the changes to `TokenEnumBuilder` without changing `token_category_EnumTokens()` in the first instance?