On Thu Nov 21 21:19:51 2024 +0000, Gabriel Ivăncescu wrote:
It's only for the name, yeah. I thought it would be either too much work or a hack because of traces, but I don't have too strong preference there, so if you are fine with it I can do that.
I think that leaving traces alone is fine. Having "Constructor" for traces seems beneficial, otherwise it would be easy to misinterpret logs if constructors and instances use the same name.