On Fri Oct 6 07:28:22 2023 +0000, Rémi Bernon wrote:
The secondary axes usage seem inverted? Fwiw a simple test, failing with the current mapping, and fixed with this would be appreciated. For instance something that reproduces the usages of the device you want to fix.
They look inverted but they're correct; I can add a /* [sic] */ if that'd help.
The attached diff should be such a test. Unfortunately, as mentioned, I couldn't figure out a way to add even one more test to the existing winmm tests.
[scratch.diff](/uploads/4c92990debf6c8d7f429568ece24a230/scratch.diff)