On Thu Jul 11 14:01:57 2024 +0000, Alfred Agrell wrote:
Before a MR can be approved and merged, the maintainers need to agree that (1) this is a problem worth solving (2) this is a good approach to said problem (3) the code looks good (4) tests pass (whether CI, manual, or both). If the answer to 1 or 2 turns out to be no, then most effort spent on 3 and 4 will become a waste of time. That's why we're focusing on the former two first. It's clear that your expectations are different.
@Alcaro you have problems? Do you don't have anyone to talk? I repeat once again, **I do not believe that this should be MERGED!** This is just a test of the hypothesis that reducing the number of context switches in the scheduler can have a positive effect on performance. First need to implement it, and then test it. Therefore, refuse any comments not related to help with tests or how to improve the code.