On Wed Nov 2 12:14:52 2022 +0000, Jinoh Kang wrote:
It was my initial thought, but I ultimately decided against it since I found it to be too much change for otherwise dead code for i386. Also, I was unsure of the implications of marking functions of large bodies as inline as to code generation.
Also, I thought it was a good idea to separate actual DWARF definitions from the unwinding functions, especially since the former is quite long.