On Thu Feb 29 10:53:09 2024 +0000, Alexandros Frantzis wrote:
changed this line in [version 2 of the diff](/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/5177/diffs?diff_id=102341&start_sha=1382876a78655d9a7fe6200e1c995ae631cafa24#2fc4f8acb340ee1b9eb3fadf8b3568bd11af1989_182_180)
(I am missing some background here)
Is what you are describing going to apply only in the pixel format reset/mismatch case, which (according to the comment) is currently handled by "wined3d creating a backup context instead"? Or are you considering this for the general case? If the latter, wouldn't there be significant performance implications?