Re: [PATCH 0/1] MR6191: ws2_32: Fully implement socket options IPX_ADDRESS and IPX_MAX_ADAPTER_NUM on Linux

[Haoran Wang (＠Low-power)]

On Mon Aug  5 19:16:46 2024 +0000, Elizabeth Figura wrote:
> Is it correct to fall back if we're on Linux and there's no IPX exposed
> in procfs? Should we report some form of failure in that case, on the
> grounds that there really is no IPX support? Note that this is what you
> do in IOCTL_AFD_WINE_GET_IPX_MAX_ADAPTER_NUM.

Makes sense. If IPX-related files are missing from procfs, it would be certain that the kernel is lacking IPX support.